R v Fanny Chard
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1822 |
| Date | 01 January 1822 |
| Court | High Court of Chancery |
English Reports Citation: 168 E.R. 911
LINCOLN'S INN
Rex
and
Fanny Chard
[4881 1822. rex v. fanny char.i). (In an indictment for larceny, if the thing stolen be described as a bank post bill, and be not set out, the Court cannot take judicial notice that it is a promissory note r or that it ia such an instrument aa, under the statute 2 Geo. II. c. 25, may be the subject of larceny, though it be described as made for the payment of money ) 912 BEX V. BUSS, & BY. 488. The prisoner was convicted before...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
1 cases
-
R v Joseph Jackson
...in evidence that the prisoner went into the room, and got into the woman's bed as if he had been her husband , that he was hi the act168 E.R. 911 LINCOLN'S INN Rex and Joseph Jackson Followed, R. v. Clarke, 1854, 6 Cox C. C. 412. Considered, R. v Dee, 1884, 15 Cox C. C. 579. Referred to, R.......