R v Galbraith
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE |
| Judgment Date | 19 May 1981 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1981] EWCA Crim J0519-1 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Docket Number | No. 5541/B/79 |
| Date | 19 May 1981 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
1266 cases
-
R (B) v DPP
...one possible view of the facts there is evidence upon which a jury could properly come to the conclusion that the defendant is guilty” ( R v Gallbraith (1981) 73 Cr App R 124, 127 per Lord Lane CJ), the evidential test should be considered to be met. Any other approach would impermissibly ......
-
R v John Fred S and Another
... ... The judge concluded that the witnesses were in fear and that the fear resulted from threats made by or on behalf of the applicants. He also rejected a submission at half-time under the second limb of Galbraith, that the identification or recognition evidence was so poor that the case should not be allowed to proceed ... 7 Mr Burke QC, who appears for the applicants this morning, but did not appear below, advances two grounds in support of the application for leave to appeal ... ...
-
Jordan Thompson v R
...to submissions of counsel, this ground must fail. Ground three For the appellant 37 Counsel relied on the principles enunciated in R v Galbraith [1981] 2 All ER 1060; [1981] 1 WCR 1039, particularly to the effect that a submission of no case to answer should be upheld when there is no evide......
- Khoo Hi Chiang v PP and Another Case
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
It's Not Just Galbraith
...certainly for this practitioner, when the chance arises it must be seized with both hands. We are all familiar with R v Galbraith [1981] 1 WLR 1039, (1981) 73 CrAppR 124 (CA) which remains the standard test but a potent ancillary weapon - certainly in cases focused on circumstantial evidenc......
30 books & journal articles
-
Subject Index
.... . . . 294R v Francis-Macrae [2006] EWCA Crim 2635. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119,137R vGalbraith [1981] 1WLR 1039 . . . . . . . . . . . 280R vGardner [2004] EWCACrim 1639. . . . . . . . 292R vGarvey [2001] EWCACrim 1365 . . . . . . . . . 295R vGauthie......
-
Four Threats to the Presumption of Innocence
...on the charge laid: for critical appraisal, see Ashworth and Redmayne, above n. 8 atch. 7.33 The English authority is RvGalbraith [1981] 1 WLR 1039, discussed by Ashworth and Redmayne,above n. 8 at value placed on the fundamental right not to be wrongly convicted. Anotherelement stems from ......
-
Authenticating ‘Things’ in English Law: Principles for Adducing Tangible Evidence in Common Law Jury Trials
...191 at [15].59 Reliability and credibility are jury concerns, see main text below, at p. 287. Cf. RvTurner [1975] QB834; RvGalbraith [1981] 1 WLR 1039; RvH[1995] 2 AC 596; RvArp [1998] 3 SCR 339 at [47]; CriminalJustice Act 2003, s. 109. Contrast RvPenney (2002) 163 CCC (3d) 329.60 Evans vR......
-
Table of Cases
...20. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50–57R vFunderburk [1990] 1WLR 587 . . . . . . . 46, 100R vGalbraith (1981) 73Cr App R124 . . . . . . . . 147R v Ghorvei (1999) 138 CCC (3d) 340 (Ont CA). 229R vGibbons [2008] EWCACrim 1574. . . . . . . . 345R v Glasgow see R v......
Request a trial to view additional results