R v Gill, R v Eccles, R v Abu-Neigh (formerly Wallace)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeThe Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales,Mr Justice Henriques,The Hon Mr Justice Irwin
Judgment Date01 December 2011
Neutral Citation[2011] EWCA Crim 2795
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Date01 December 2011
Docket NumberCase No: 2008/06140/A2 (Gill) 2011/05234/A2 (Abu-Neigh (formerly Wallace))

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
2 cases
  • The Decision on Review of the Tariff in the Case of R v Ke (Frank) Yuan
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 5 October 2012
    ...20 As regards progress made by the applicant in prison, the approach to be taken is as set out by the Court of Appeal in In re Gill [2012] 1 W.L.R. 1441. At [28], Lord Judge CJ (sitting with Henriques J and Irwin J) said that when considering the issue of exceptional progress, the court is ......
  • R v Loren Anders Sundkvist
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 17 June 2016
    ...a point can only be raised when the court is reviewing the tariff pursuant to the provisions of schedule 22 of the 2003 Act: see Gill [2011] EWCA Crim 2795. This otherwise forms no ground of appeal of itself. That is not to say that the appellant's exemplary conduct is irrelevant: not only ......