R v Gnango

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
JudgeLord Justice Thomas
Judgment Date26 July 2010
Neutral Citation[2010] EWCA Crim 1691
Docket NumberCase No: 2008/03682/B5 & 2009/03914/B5
Date26 July 2010

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • R v Gnango
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 14 December 2011
    ...This radical change of case is perhaps inspired by the obiter comments of the Court of Appeal and by commentary on those comments in [2011] Crim L R 151, 30 In the alternative Mr Altman has sought to rely upon the doctrine of parasitic accessory liability that had been rejected by the Cour......
  • S v Madubela
    • South Africa
    • KwaZulu-Natal High Court, Pietermaritzburg
    • 1 January 2014
    ...687 (A) [29] R v Jefferson and Others [1994] 1 ALL ER 270 [30] Milton South African Criminal Law and Procedure at 78 [31] bid 92 [32] [2011] 1 ALL ER 153 [33] S v Mgedezi and others 1989 (1) SA 687 (A) at 702H-I [34] (1989) 60 DR 256 at 262-3 [35] I v Director of Public Prosecutions; M v Di......
  • Hksar v Yuen Miu Fun
    • Hong Kong
    • Court of Appeal (Hong Kong)
    • 31 May 2012
    ...was that the judge had not properly directed the jury on what Mr McCoy described as type 3 joint enterprise specified in R v Gnango [2011] 1 WLR 1414 when the judge had failed to specify to the jury that the applicant must have foreseen that death might be caused by Huang and Yue when she r......
  • R v Brenton Roper and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 10 November 2011
    ...carried by Newland, who fired it several times in an attempt to kill. The judge considered various authorities, including that of Gnango [2010] EWCA Crim 1691. That case concerned a shooting incident where tragically although one gunman shot at another, the person killed was a wholly innoce......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Secondary Liability In The Criminal Law
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 24 June 2011
    ...has not been the subject of detailed consideration by the courts but the issue may be resolved by the Supreme Court in R v. Gnango [2010] EWCA Crim. 1691. In that case D's conviction for murder was quashed by the Court of Appeal. D and D1 were involved in a gunfight. The case for the Crown ......