R v Governor of Blundeston Prison, ex parte Gaffney
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1982 |
| Date | 1982 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
12 cases
- R v Ireland; R v Burstow
-
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Naughton
...twice. Mr Weatherby, relying on four cases dealing with concurrent sentences: R v Governor of Blundeston Prison, Ex parte GaffneyWLR ([1982] 1 WLR 696), R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex parte Read ((1987) 9 Cr App R (S) 206), R v Governor of Styal Prison, Ex parte Mooney (......
-
Anthony Montgomery and The Governor of Her Majesty's Prison Magheraberry
...a series of cases from 1982 to 1997 which were then analysed in turn. They were Reg. v Governor of Blundeston Prison, Ex parte Gaffney [1982] 1 WLR 696, Reg. v Secretary of State for the Home Office, Ex Parte Read [1987] 9 Cr App Rep(S) 206 and Reg. v Governor of Styal Prison, Ex Parte Moon......
-
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte A
...of the position was founded on a clear line of Divisional Court decisions, starting with R v Governor of Blundeston Prison ex p Gaffney [1982] 1 WLR 696. But the courts had erred. On the applicant's application for judicial review the Divisional Court overruled the earlier decisions: R v Go......
Get Started for Free