R v Governor of Brixton Prison, ex parte Schtraks
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1962 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 1962 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
120 cases
-
Cheng v Governor of Pentonville Prison
...character’ have so far defied precise definition. As Viscount Radcliffe said in R. v. Governor of Brixton Prison, Ex parte SchtraksELR [1964] A.C. 556, 589[1]: ‘Generally speaking, the courts' reluctance to offer a definition has been due, I think, to the realization that it is virtually im......
- Re Wilson; ex parte Witness T
-
Shannon v Fanning
...they have to be considered. The present time is very different from 1891 (recte 1890), when Caslioni's case was decided”. SchtraksUNK [1962] 3 All ER 529. The facts are not relevant; the importance of the case lies in its being the last reported decision of the English Courts prior to the 1......
-
Russell v Fanning
...IR 317 CONSTITUTION ART 15.6 CONSTITUTION ART 39 R V GOVERNOR OF PENTONVILLE 1973 AC 931 CASTIONI, IN RE 1891 1 QB 149 SCHTRAKS, EX PARTE 1964 AC 556 QUINN, STATE V RYAN 1965 IR 70 MAXWELL INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES 12ED P28 ARMAH V GOVT OF GHANA 1968 AC 192 FUGITIVE OFFENDERS ACT 1881 CLAP......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Terrorism and International Humanitarian Law
...which focus on the rights of the person to beextradited.81Lord Castlereagh, in L Oppenheim ‘International Law: A Treatise’ (1955) 705.82[1964] AC 556 at 583.83Campbell op cit note 80 at 586.84The term ‘auto interpret’ was used by the ILA Committee on International Terrorismto describe state......