R v Governor of Brixton Prison, ex parte Armah
Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
Judgment Date | 1966 |
Year | 1966 |
Court | House of Lords |
Date | 1966 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
78 cases
- Harpers Trading (M) Sdn Bhd v National Union of Commercial Workers
- Chong Kok Lim and Others v Yong Su Hian
-
Boyd (Delroy) v The Commissioner of Correctional Services & DPP
...10 This formulation is identical to that set out in section 25 of the English Indictable Offences Act 1848. In Regina v Governor of Brixton Prison and another Ex Parte Armah [1966] 3 WLR 23 Lyell J at page 35H expressed the view that the words "strong or probable presumption of guilt" were......
- Cheung Ying-Lun v Government of Australia
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Disciplined for `bringing a sport into disrepute': a framework for judicial review.
...tends logically to show the existence ... of facts relevant to the issue to be determined'. (58) See, eg, Armah v Government of Ghana [1968] AC 192, 235 (Lord Reid), 257 (Lord Upjohn). See also Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321, 356 (Mason CJ). (59) Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the ......