R v Governor of Brixton Prison, ex parte Caborn-Waterfield

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date12 April 1960
Date12 April 1960
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
27 cases
  • R v DPP and Director of Correctional Services ex parte Dave Antonio Grant
    • Jamaica
    • Supreme Court (Jamaica)
    • 23 March 2001
    ...it follows inexorably that he is being committed as an accused person 33 The decision cited by Counsel in Re Cobion v. Waterfield [1960] 2 All E.R. 178 is readily distinguished from the instant case. 34 For the aforesaid reasons I hold that it is neither unjust nor oppressive or both to re......
  • Wiest v DPP
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • R v Governor of Pentonville Prison, ex parte Zezza
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 20 May 1982
    ...an accused person. 24My Lords, I think this is the reasoning underlying the decision of the Divisional Court in Reg. v. Governor of Brixton Prison, Ex Parte Caborn-Waterfield [1960] 2 Q.B. 498Extradition Act 1870 and the Anglo-ltalian Extradition Treaty 1873. In connection with the Treaty, ......
  • Mathias Ortmann v United States of America
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • 4 November 2020
    ...it. 98 99 100 The 1870 Act used the term “arrangement” instead of treaty. R v Governor of Brixton Prison, ex parte Caborn-Waterfield [1960] 2 QB 498 (QB). See also R v Wilson (1877) 3 QBD 42 (QB); Government of the Federal Republic of Germany v Sotiriadis [1975] AC 1 (HL) at 21 per Lord Dip......
  • Get Started for Free