R v Governor of Brockhill Prison, ex parte Evans (No. 1)
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Year | 1997 |
Date | 1997 |
Court | Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
49 cases
-
R v Governor of Brockhill Prison, ex parte Evans (No. 2)
...the Divisional Court held that her release date properly calculated was 17 September 1996 and ordered that she be released immediately: [1997] Q.B. 443. On 10 June 1997 Collins J. dismissed her application for damages for false imprisonment: the Court of Appeal by a majority allowed her ap......
-
Lewis (Neville) and Attorney General for Jamaica v Superintendent of St. Catherine District Prison
...... on 13th January, 1999, wrote to His Excellency the Governor-General advising him that: . ".. we intended to ...the Attorney-General for Jamaica et al, S.C.C.A. No. 104/98 delivered 18th December, 1998, at page 7: . ......
-
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte A
...review of the decision fixing her release date together with damages for false imprisonment. On 15 November 1996 the Divisional Court ([1997] QB 443) held that her release date properly calculated was 17 September 1996 and ordered that she be released immediately. On 10 June 1997 Collins J ......
-
JR 27’s Application (No 1)
...lay in the fact that what was in issue was the exercise of a discretion independent of the underlying proceedings (see ex p Evans [1997] QB 443). [49] I consider that exactly the same reasoning should be applied to this application. I note that in Marper [2006] UKHL 10 the issue before the ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Appellate Jurisdiction of the Caribbean Court of Justice
...per Taylor L.J., Pratt and Morgan v. Attorney General of Jamaica [1994] 2 AC 1, and Regina v. Governor of Brockhill Prison ex parte Evans [1997] QB 443 at p.462. Thus in Pratt and Morgan it was submitted that: ‘The Board is not bound by its previous decisions and it does not follow them if ......