R v Griffin
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | LORD JUSTICE MUSTILL |
| Judgment Date | 12 February 1988 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1988] EWCA Crim J0212-5 |
| Docket Number | No. 5677/G1/87 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Date | 12 February 1988 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
5 cases
-
Daltel Europe Ltd and Others v Makki and Others
...of such an analogy, that it has been said that there is no prosecutor in the case of a contempt application: see for example Mustill LJ in R v. Griffin (1989) 88 Cr App R 63 at 67 in a passage which points out many differences between proceedings of a summary nature for a criminal contempt ......
-
You Xin v Public Prosecutor and another appeal
...Wilm 243; 97 ER 94 (refd) R v Davies [1906] 1 KB 32 (refd) R v Davison (1821) 4 B & Ald 329; 106 ER 958 (refd) R v Joseph Griffin (1988) 88 Cr App R 63 (refd) R v Lefroy (1873) LR 8 QB 134 (folld) R v Logan [1974] Crim LR 609 (refd) R v Kevin John Moran (1985) 81 Cr App R 51 (refd) R v Will......
-
R v M
...Court under RSC Ord 52. (The requirement for urgency before the summary jurisdiction can be exercised was queried in R v Griffin (1988) 88 Cr App R 63, but that need not detain us here.)16 We note that, at p 89e of the Balogh case, Stephenson LJ said that he did not accept the argument that......
-
R v Santiago (Steven Anthony)
...the judge had the jurisdiction to deal with it summarily. 13 The conclusion that the judge had jurisdiction is supported by a passage in Griffin (1989) 88 Cr App R 63, at 69 per Mustill LJ: "We should add that certain dicta (for example, in Balogh) may be read as suggesting that the court h......
Request a trial to view additional results