R v Guildhall Magistrates' Court, ex parte Primlaks Holdings Company (Panama) Inc.
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1989 |
| Date | 1989 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 cases
-
Blanchfield v Harnett
...CO V EBBSMITH 1895 2 QB 669 HAUGHEY V MORIARTY 1999 3 IR 28 R V GUILDHALL MAGISTRATES COURT EX-PARTE PRIMLAKS HOLDING CO (PANAMA) INC 1990 1 QB 261 BYRNE V GREY 1988 IR 31 BERKELEY V EDWARDS 1988 IR 217 KEATING V GOV OF MOUNTJOY PRISON 1990 ILRM 850 BARRY V FITZPATRICK 1996 1 ILRM 512 ......
-
R (Faisaltex Ltd) v Preston Crown Court
...and to search for and seize items present there. It has rightly been described as a draconian power (see R v. Guildhall Magistrates' Court, ex parte Primlaks Holdings Co. (Panama) Inc., [1990] 1 QB 261, 272, and as Latham LJ put it in R (Redknapp) v. Commissioner of City of London Police [......
-
Burgin v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
...there. It has rightly been described as a draconian power (see R v GuildfordMagistrates' Court, Ex p Primlaks Holdings Co (Panama) Inc [1990] 1QB 261, 271), and as Latham LJ put it in Redknapp v Commissioner ofPolice for City of London [2009] 1All ER 229, para 13: "The obtaining of a search......
-
R (Rawlinson & Hunter Trustees and Others) v Central Criminal Court and Another Vincent Tchenguiz and (Interested Party)
...it is proper to grant the warrants. This has been repeatedly stated by the courts: see for example Parker LJ in R v Guildhall Magistrates ex p Primlaks Holdings (Panama) inc [1990] 1 QB 261 at 270. In R(Bright) v Central Criminal Court [2001] 1 WLR 662 Judge LJ (as he then was) said at pa......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Legal Privilege in Criminal Cases Generally, and Money‐Laundering Cases in Particular
...better idea than the court whether the documents are essential to his case. (36) Ex parte B, above, per Lord Taylor at p. 503H. (37) [1989] 89 Cr App R 215. (38) [1993] Cr L R 866. (39) Tangential support for this approach is found in the judgment of the Divisional Court in R v Leeds Crown ......