R v Hall
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1952 |
Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
Stubley v Western Australia
...lacking in the concreteness and verisimilitude which testimony could convey. The difficulty is illustrated by what Connolly J said in R v Raabe, a case in which the applicant was convicted of assault occasioning actual bodily harm 78: ‘After the jury was empanelled his counsel immediately i......
-
Alexander v The State
...(supra) was given, is provided in Cross on Evidence (4th Edn.) 318 — 19. After referring to the fact that Lord Goddard in R. v. Hall [1952] 1 K. B. 302, 307 conceded that regard must be had to the defences open to the accused, the learned author states: “it may be assumed that evidence of a......
-
R v Flack
...that in all the circumstances the charges might well have been tried together, although the reason given by the Judge was wrong. ( The King v. Hall– 35 Criminal Appeal Reports at page 172.) 4 In the present case, Mr. Gower on behalf of the appellant argues very persuasively that the reasons......
-
R v Ludlow
...an exercise of discretion unless it can be seen that justice has not been done or unless "compelled to do so by some overwhelming fact": R. v. Hall (1952) 1 King's Bench 302 per Lord Goddard, the Lord Chief Justice, at page 305; R. v. Flack (1969) 1 Weekly Law Reports 937. It may be that ......
Request a trial to view additional results