R v Hall
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
| Date | 1963 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
-
DPP v Quilligan and O'Reilly
...CooneyIRDLRMDLRM [1982] I.R. 337; [1982] I.L.R.M. 190; [1983] I.L.R.M. 89. The People v. ShawIR [1982] I.R. 1. Ward v. HolmanELRWLRUNK [1964] 1 Q.B. 273; [1964] 2 W.L.R. 1313; [1964] 1 All E.R. 729. The State (Aer Lingus) v. The Labour Court (Unreported, Supreme Court, 6th July, 1986). Manu......
-
P v Judges of the Circuit Court
...cases cannot be read without keeping at least one eye on the very substantial changes in social attitudes over time. 30 In R. v. Hall [1964] 1 Q.B. 273, the Court of Appeal (per Lord Parker C.J.), having reviewed earlier authorities, concluded:- ‘This Court has come to the conclusion that ......
-
Crampton v R
...unless it was incapable of any other construction.’ 62 Two relatively recent decisions in New South Wales are to a similar effect. In R v Page66 the Court of Criminal Appeal adopted the approach of Scarman LJ in Preece67 but as a concession was made on that matter by the Crown there the que......
-
PP v Judges of the Circuit Court
...and are so to an impermissible extent. It is true that this is an issue on which there are conflicting English authorities: R. v. Hall [1964] 1 Q.B. 273, holding that consent was not a required element, while R. v. Preece and Howell [1977] Q.B. 370 taking the contrary view. It is pointed ou......
Request a trial to view additional results