R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC, ex parte M
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
| Year | 1998 |
| Date | 1998 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
30 cases
-
R (on the application of SL) v Westminster City Council
...of that subsection, and indeed may be said to have prompted it. In R v City of Westminster and others ex p M, P, A and X [ Ex p. M (1998) 30 HLR 10] the claimants were destitute asylum seekers. They were not in need of care and attention, but because they were destitute, without accommodati......
-
X v Hounslow London Borough Council
... ... the Housing Act 1985 (‘the 1985 Act’) would apply: R v Hammersmith and Fulham Borough Council ex parte M (1997) 30 HLR 10 ... It follows ... 31 23. Counsel relied upon O'Rourke v Camden LBC [1997] AC 188 , where reliance was placed on section 63 of the 1985 ... ...
-
R (W, a Child by his Litigation Friend J) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
...legislation will be invalid if repugnant to a statute (including a statute other than its enabling Act). In R v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council ex p. M (1998) 30 HLR 10, Lord Woolf MR (giving the judgment of the Court of Appeal) summarised the ratio of JCWI 1 as follows: “by ......
-
MK and Another v The Secretary of State for the Home Department Refugee Action (Intervener)
...the purposes of that provision. That argument was accepted by the Court of Appeal in R v Hammersmith & Fulham ex parte M and others (1997) 30 HLR 10 which held that all destitute asylum seekers, able-bodied as well as disabled, who were deprived of other support, were potentially entitl......
Get Started for Free
