R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC, ex parte M
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1998 |
| Year | 1998 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
30 cases
-
R (on the application of SL) v Westminster City Council
...of that subsection, and indeed may be said to have prompted it. In R v City of Westminster and others ex p M, P, A and X [ Ex p. M (1998) 30 HLR 10] the claimants were destitute asylum seekers. They were not in need of care and attention, but because they were destitute, without accommodati......
-
R (W and Others) v Croydon London Borough Council and another
... ... out, and also to the decision of this court in Wahid v Tower Hamlets LBC [2002] EWCA Civ 287 ... In that case Hale LJ as she then was stated ... ...
-
MK and Another v The Secretary of State for the Home Department Refugee Action (Intervener)
...the purposes of that provision. That argument was accepted by the Court of Appeal in R v Hammersmith & Fulham ex parte M and others (1997) 30 HLR 10 which held that all destitute asylum seekers, able-bodied as well as disabled, who were deprived of other support, were potentially entitl......
-
The Queen (on the application of Timon Ncube) v Brighton and Hove City Council
...was given a wide meaning and was not limited “age, illness, disability” in the case of R. v. Hammersmith & Fulham L.B.C., ex p. M (1997) 30 H.L.R. 10, CA. In R (Westminster City Council) v National Asylum Support Service above at para. 41, Lord Hoffmann said the following: “…The clear p......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
The Exclusion of (Failed) Asylum Seekers from Housing and Home: Towards an Oppositional Discourse
...One of the quirks of the NASS system is that if the asylumseeker was eligible for local authority support under the NAA 1948, then305116 (1997) 30 HLR 10.117 Home Office, op. cit., n. 69.118 Immigration and Asylum Act 1999, s. 117(5), which repealed s. 186 of the HousingAct 1996.119 The cri......
-
Human Rights: Where Do We Go from Here?
...163 U S 537 (189 6).16 181.17 See, eg, R.v SoS for Social Services, ex p JCWI [1996] 4 All ER 385, RvHammersmith and FulhamLBC,ex p M (1998) 30 HLR10; R.vWandsworthLBC,ex p O [2000] 4 All ER590, all drawing uponR (EastbourneInhabitants) (1803) 4 East103,102 ER 769, 770.This i s not the plac......