R v Harris-Rivett

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourts-Martial Appeal Court
Year1955
Date1955

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • PP; Rajagopal
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Jusoh v PP
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • R v Smith
    • United Kingdom
    • Courts-Martial Appeal Court
    • Invalid date
    ...C.C. 711. F2(1827) 1 Lew.C.C. 164. F3(1862) 2 F. & F. 857. F4[1954] 1 W.L.R. 228; [1954] 1 All E.R. 373. F5[1955] 3 W.L.R. 823; [1955] 3 All E.R. 567. F6[1935] 1 K.B. 146; 51 T.L.R. F7(1834) 2 Lew.C.C. 122. F8Ibid. 123. F9(1838) 2 Lew.C.C. 123, 124. F10(1874) 13 Cox C.C. 23. F11Ibid. 24......
  • Buckley v Convening Authority
    • Ireland
    • Courts-Martial Appeal Court
    • 1 January 1998
    ...their presence was in an equivalent position to a civilian who was in custody being interviewed by the police. R. v. Harris-RivettELR [1956] 1 Q.B. 220 considered. 6. That as it was the fact of custody which determined the obligation to caution, r. 3 of the Judges' Rules applied to the appe......
  • Get Started for Free