R v Hart (Walter Berkley)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Criminal Appeal |
| Year | 1932 |
| Date | 1932 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
32 cases
-
The People (at the suit of the Director of Public Prosecutions) v M.S
...of the rule in other common law jurisdictions. Criminal Trials and the Application of Browne v Dunn England & Wales 46 . R v Hart (1932) 23 Cr App R 202 concerned a trial for assault where the defence called three alibi witnesses. None of the witnesses were cross-examined nor was there any......
-
Seet Melvin v The Law Society of Singapore
...(1842) 9 M & W 681; 152 ER 288 (distd) PP v Sanli bin Sunggoh [1989] 1 MLJ 14 (refd) R v Bircham [1972] Crim LR 430 (distd) R v Hart (1932) 23 Cr App R 202 (distd) Rakusen v Ellis, Munday & Clarke [1912] 1 Ch 831 (folld) Shore v Bedford (1843) 5 Man & G 271; 134 ER 567 (distd) Shyamsingh v ......
-
Rivas (Henry), Infante (Giovanni) v R
...evidence of Cpl. Gordon and the appellants were deprived of their chance of acquittal. Counsel relied on R v Burgess (1962) 5 W.I.R. 59 and R v Hart (1932) 23 Cr. App. R 202. 66 We have already observed, in dealing with previous grounds that before the appellants were called upon to accou......
-
[1995] 2 SLR 323
...(1842) 9 M & W 681; 152 ER 288 (distd) PP v Sanli bin Sunggoh [1989] 1 MLJ 14 (refd) R v Bircham [1972] Crim LR 430 (distd) R v Hart (1932) 23 Cr App R 202 (distd) Rakusen v Ellis, Munday & Clarke [1912] 1 Ch 831 (folld) Shore v Bedford (1843) 5 Man & G 271; 134 ER 567 (distd) Shyamsingh v ......
Get Started for Free
