R v Hayward, R v Jones (Anthony), R v Purvis
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | THE VICE PRESIDENT |
| Judgment Date | 31 January 2001 |
| Neutral Citation | [2001] EWCA Crim 168 |
| Docket Number | Cases No: 200000830 X3, 2000002586 Y2 and 199906468 X4 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Date | 31 January 2001 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
114 cases
-
HC Trading Malta Ltd v Savannah Cement Ltd
...absence from the hearing, applying by analogy the factors identified by the Court of Appeal in R v Hayward, Jones and Purvis [2001] EWCA Crim 168, [2001] 2 Cr. App. R. 11 at § 22.5. I concluded that it was clearly appropriate to proceed because: i) the proceedings had been duly served on t......
-
R v Marc Daniel Jackson
...correct manner, following the procedure set out in R v Jones [2003] 1 AC 1, which itself approved the detailed checklist set out in R v Hayward [2001] QB 862. He considered all the relevant material with care and concluded that he should exercise his discretion to proceed in the applicant's......
-
Bernadette Patricia McDaid v Nursing & Midwifery Council
...when exercising the discretion to proceed in a criminal case in the absence of the defendant are set out in the case of R v Hayward [2001] EWCA Crim 168, approved on appeal by the House of Lords, sub nom R v Jones (Anthony) [2002] UKHL 5 and applied to professional regulatory proceedings by......
-
R v Martin Hamberger
...which was necessary. The judge then considered the criteria for trial in absence stated by this court in R v Haywood, Jones and Purvis [2001] QB 862 and endorsed by the House of Lords in R v Jones [2003] l AC 1, and ruled that this was a rare and exceptional case in which the trial could pr......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Trials in absentia and the cuts to criminal legal aid
...vUnited Kingdom (1992) 15 EHRR 417 at [33] reads: ‘Article 6(3)(c) guarantees minimum rights butthey are not exhaustive’.54. RvHayward [2001] 3 WLR 125, CA.55. Ibid. at [22] (Rose LJ) (emphasis added).56. Ibid. (emphasis added).57. A. Ashworth, ‘Is the Criminal Law a Lost Cause?’ (2000) LQR......
-
Proceeding in Absence: The ‘Default Position’ in Magistrates’ Courts? R v Rathor [2018] EWHC 3278
...The court’sresponse to the application for judicial review stated that the Judge had regard to the principles set out inR v Jones [2001] EWCA Crim 168 when refusing to adjourn, although it did not state ‘how he had regardto [them], or indeed what if any, reliance he placed on the various fa......