R v Hicklin
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
| Date | 1865 |
| Year | 1865 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
31 cases
8 books & journal articles
-
Pornography and Politics: the Court, the Constitution, and the Commission
...U.S. 476, 502 (1957)(Harlan, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part).7 352 U.S. 380 (1957).8 Ibid., at 383.9 Regina v. Hicklin, L.R. 3 Q.B. 360 (1868). The famous test of obscenity as "pornographicmatter having influence upon particularly susceptible persons" appears in the opinionof......
-
Defending Against a Charge of Obscenity in the Internet Age: How Google Searches Can Illuminate Miller's "contemporary Community Standards"
..."Contemporary Community Standards" and Speech on the Internet, 2 GEO. J.L. & pub. POL'y 357, 358-59 (2004) (quoting Queen v. Hicklin, (1868) L.R. 3 Q.B. 360, 368). 46. Robbins & Mason, supra note 5, at 523 (citing Queen v. Hicklin, (1868) L.R. 3 Q.B. 360, 371); Yun, supra note 45. 47. Boyce......
-
Pornography as Sex Discrimination? A Critical Reflection on the Constitutional Court’s Interpretation of Gender Politics, Differentiation and (Unfair) Discrimination
...S cott, Applicant v Benja min Hicklin and Anothe r, Justices of Wolverhamp ton, Respondents ( popularly cited as Regina v Hicklin) (1868) LR 3 QB 360 The Ch ief Justice declare d: “I think th e test of obscenity is this, wh ether the tendency of the mat ter charged as obscenity i s to depri......
-
The Problems With Pornography Regulation: Lessons from History
...of judicial approaches to obscenity).36. See, e.g., U.S. v. Kennerley, 209 F. 119, 120 (S.D.N.Y. 1913) (quoting R v. Hicklin [1868] L.R. 3 QB 360 at 371 (Eng.)). For an overview of early English and American obscenity regulation, see generally Alpert, supra note 35.37. See, e.g., Thomas I. ......
Get Started for Free
