R v IRC, ex parte Bishopp
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judgment Date | 1999 |
Date | 1999 |
Year | 1999 |
Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Autologic Holdings Plc and Others v Commissioners of Inland Revenue; Test Claimants in Loss Relief Group Litigation v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
...had considered and applied the principle in Barraclough v Brown, the most recent being R v Inland Revenue Commissioners Ex p Bishopp [1999] STC 531. He then crisply summarised his own view (p 603, para 25): "I am not going to go through the judgments in the cases which were cited to me. The......
-
R (Pretty) v DPP
...... again the considerations discussed in the speeches of Lord Steyn and myself in R v DPP, ex parte Kebilene [2000] 2 AC 326 . . 114 The office of Director is a statutory ......
-
Autologic Holdings plc et al. v. United Kingdom (Commissioners of Inland Revenue), [2005] N.R. Uned. 117 (HL)
...had considered and applied the principle in Barraclough v. Brown , the most recent being R. v. Inland Revenue Commissioners Ex p Bishopp [1999] STC 531. He then crisply summarised his own view (p 603, para. 25): "I am not going to go through the judgments in the cases which were cited ......
-
Association of British Travel Agents Ltd v Civil Aviation Authority
...not. 76 In support of his submissions, Mr. Griffiths relies upon, among other cases, R v Inland Revenue Commissioners, ex parte Bishopp [1999] STC 531. In that case Dyson J (as he then was) refused declaratory relief in respect of a pre-transaction ruling by the Inland Revenue. Among other ......
Request a trial to view additional results