R v Jamie Daniel Fort

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLord Justice Aikens,or
Judgment Date13 December 2013
Neutral Citation[2013] EWCA Crim 2332
Docket NumberCase No: 201203786 A3,No 201203786 A3
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Date13 December 2013

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • R (Lucinda Vowles) v Secretary of State for Justice and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 5 February 2015
    ...the way in which the power is drafted, to make such a direction in respect of a person under 21 at the time of conviction: see Fort [2013] EWCA Crim 2332 at paragraphs 20 It is clear that the hospital direction has been little used. Unsurprisingly until 2009 no more than five such orders h......
  • R v Knowles and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 5 February 2015
    ...the way in which the power is drafted, to make such a direction in respect of a person under 21 at the time of conviction: see Fort [2013] EWCA Crim 2332 at paragraphs 20 It is clear that the hospital direction has been little used. Unsurprisingly until 2009 no more than five such orders h......
  • R v Peter Quirk
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 7 May 2014
    ...General's Reference (No 54 of 2011) [2011] EWCA Crim 2276 and Fox [2011] EWCA Crim. 3299: to which we also add the case of Fort [2013] EWCA Crim 2332. 35 One central point established by these authorities is the difference between the two potential release regimes. Under the custodial regim......
  • R v Craig Maldwyn Anthony Stead
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 2 December 2014
    ...a person was over 21 for the reasons set out in that decision. The observation of the court to that effect was confirmed in R v Frost [2013] EWCA Crim 2332, [2014] 2 Cr App R(S) 24. 13 It is clear, therefore, that the decision of this court in the 2012 appeal was made in error. There was no......
3 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill A Practitioner's Guide to Mental Health Law Part One. Overview of the Mental Health Act 1983
    • 29 August 2014
    ...60 110 R v Dr Collins & Ashworth Hospital Authority ex parte Brady [2000] 1 MHLR 17 230 R v Drew [2003] UKHL 25 99, 178, 279 R v Fort [2013] EWCA Crim 2332 111, 127 R v Goucher [2012] 1 MHLR 107 110 R v Howell [1981] 3 WLR 501 (CA) 60 R v Hurst [2007] EWCA Crim 3436 110 R v IA [2005] 1 MHLR......
  • Restriction Orders
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill A Practitioner's Guide to Mental Health Law Part Four. Criminal Admissions under the Mental Health Act 1983
    • 29 August 2014
    ...conclude that any future decision regarding release into the community should be made by the Parole Board, not the MHT. In R v Fort [2013] EWCA Crim 2332, the Court of Appeal confirmed (at [61]) that if: the offender poses a significant risk of serious harm to members of the public occasion......
  • Hospital Directions under Section 45A of the Mental Health Act 1983
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill A Practitioner's Guide to Mental Health Law Part Four. Criminal Admissions under the Mental Health Act 1983
    • 29 August 2014
    ...imprisonment being unavailable in respect of anyone any younger ( AG’s reference (No 54 of 2011) [2011] EWCA Crim 2276 and R v Fort [2013] EWCA Crim 2332). 128 A Practitioner’s Guide to Mental Health Law 13.3 CRITERIA According to section 45A(2) of the MHA 1983, the Crown Court may impose t......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT