R v Jogee
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judge | Lord Neuberger,Lord Thomas,Lady Hale,Lord Hughes,Lord Toulson |
| Judgment Date | 18 February 2016 |
| Neutral Citation | [2016] UKPC 7 |
| Date | 18 February 2016 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
49 cases
-
R v Leon Palmer
... ... 6 The applicant himself subsequently sent a letter to the court seeking, in courteous terms, to add a third ground of appeal which appears to be based on the decision of the Supreme Court in R v Jogee. That has not been pursued by Miss Frost. It was based, we think, on a misapprehension of the effect of the decision in Jogee, and we need say no more about it ... 7 The explanation advanced for the application for an extension of time is a reasonable one, and if there were ... ...
-
Pitman v The State (Trinidad and Tobago); Hernandez v The State (Trinidad and Tobago)
...and arises from the recent decision of the Board as to the law of joint responsibility in R v JogeeandR v Ruddock [2016] UKSC 8 and [2016] UKPC 7: [2016] 2 WLR 681. Pitman ; facts 3 As long ago as 11 December 2001 John Cropper, a respectable householder in the Cascade area of Port of Spai......
-
Gerard Kelly and Malachi O’Doherty
...Chan Wing Siu & Others v R [1985] AC 168 is no longer regarded as good law since the decision in Jogee and Ruddock v The Queen (Jamaica) [2016] UKPC 7. [38] In my view counsel for Dr O’Doherty has erroneously referred the court to the concept of joint enterprise and this therefore requires ......
-
R v GS
...on a change in the law, leave is characterised as “exceptional” and will only be granted if substantial injustice can be shown: R v Jogee [2016] UKPC 7; [2017] AC 387, at [100]; R v Johnson [2016] EWCA Crim 1613; [2017] 1 Cr App R 12, at [10] and following. The requirement that substantial......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
-
Case Law
...v Regina [1997] 1 AC 1 Regina v Rahman [2008] 3 WLR 264 R v Clovis Patterson SCCA 81/2004 Delivered April 20, 2007 Ruddock v Regina [2016] UKPC 7 R v Jogee [2016] UKSC 8 Principles Forseeability Ruddock and Jogee revisit the principles and held: liability as an accessory required both condu......
-
Extended Joint Criminal Enterprise in Australia
...inthe United Kingdom Supreme Court in RvJogee [2016] UKSC 8, [2016] 2 WLR 681 and by the PrivyCouncil on appeal from Jamaica in RvRuddock [2016] UKPC 7, [2016] 2 WLR 681 in which it wasdetermined that the common law of England and Wales had taken a ‘wrong turn’ (Jogee at [87]). Themistake w......
-
End of an Era: Court of Appeal gives Final Judgment on the Contemplation Principle in Cases of Murder by Joint Enterprise
...in RvJogee [2016] UKSC 8 (unusually, the Supreme Courtwas simultaneously sitting as the Privy Council to decide the appeal in Ruddock vR[2016] UKPC 7).In its judgment, the Supreme Court unanimously held that the courts took a ‘wrong turn’ by introdu-cing the ‘contemplation’ principle into c......
-
Intending to Assist in Murder: When Will the Use of a Deadly Weapon Constitute Going Beyond the Confines of an Agreed Plan? R v Harper [2019] EWCA Crim 343
...by D1 and D2 must intend to assist orencourage D1 to act with the requisite mens rea. (See R v Jogee [2016] UKSC 8; Ruddock v The Queen[2016] UKPC 7 at [8–11]) In R v Anderson and Morris [1966] 2 QB 110, it was said that:[W]here two persons embark on a joint enterprise, each is liable for t......
Request a trial to view additional results