R v Jon Andrewes
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judge | Lord Justice Davis |
Judgment Date | 07 August 2020 |
Neutral Citation | [2020] EWCA Crim 1055 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
Docket Number | Case No: 201803556 C2 |
Date | 07 August 2020 |
To continue reading
Request your trial5 cases
-
R v Andrewes
...24 before Lord Hodge, Deputy President Lord Kitchin Lord Hamblen Lord Burrows Lord Stephens Supreme Court Trinity Term On appeal from: 2020 EWCA Crim 1055 Appellant Martin Evans Cameron Brown QC (Instructed by CPS Appeals and Review Unit) Respondent Jonathan Ashley-Norman QC Richard Reynold......
-
R v Paul John Asplin
...“apparently loose causal test” ( R v Waya [2012] UKSC 51, [2013] 1 AC 294 at [8]). As Lord Justice Davis explained in R v Andrewes [2020] EWCA Crim 1055: “73. Generally speaking, the courts in confiscation proceedings have been disinclined to pursue a technical or artificial approach to ......
-
Nadia Saroya v The Queen
...directly on point, so far as we are aware, but there are some decisions which deal with similar questions. 30 In R v Andrewes [2020] EWCA Crim 1055 the defendant had obtained the position of chief executive of the Torbay and Royal Cornwall NHS Hospital trust by lying prodigiously in his jo......
-
John Kenneth Collins v The Director of Public Prosecutions
...section 6(5)(b). The meaning of that concept is authoritatively explained by the Court of Appeal Criminal Division in R. v. Andrewes [2020] EWCA Crim 1055. At the point when the Magistrates' Court is considering whether to impose the default term, the context is that the court which made t......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Confiscation Orders: Finding a Middle Way Between Two Extremes
...set of qualifications was equally impressive work experience. It was all untrue.Andrewes had told, ‘a series of staggering lies’([2020] EWCA Crim 1055, at [21])) in the courseof a sophisticated ‘CV fraud’. He was charged with obtaining a pecuniary advantage by deceptionunder section 16(1),......
-
Confiscation Orders: Finding a Middle Way Between Two Extremes
...set of qualifications was equally impressive work experience. It was all untrue.Andrewes had told, ‘a series of staggering lies’([2020] EWCA Crim 1055, at [21])) in the courseof a sophisticated ‘CV fraud’. He was charged with obtaining a pecuniary advantage by deceptionunder section 16(1),......