R v Jordan
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1956 |
| Court | Court of Criminal Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
14 cases
-
R v Blaue
...320-321 and Smith and Hogan, 3rd edition, p. 214. 8 There have been two cases in recent years which have some bearing upon this topic - Regina v. Jordan, (1956) 40 Criminal Appeal Reports and Smith. In Jordan the Court of Criminal Appeal, after conviction, admitted some medical evidence whi......
-
Syed Jafaralsadeg bin Abdul Kadir v Public Prosecutor
......Hallet J in R v Jordan [1956] 40 Cr App R 152 earlier said that it is only in the most exceptional circumstances and subject to what may be described as exceptional conditions that the court is ever willing to listen to additional evidence. This attitude was followed by the local courts. I added further that the ......
-
Dunne v DPP
...be raised as a defence (whether full or partial) to a charge of murder? Held by O?Malley J that, having considered R v Jordan?(1956) 40 Cr. App. R. 152, R v Steel?[1981] 1 WLR 690 and R v Pagett?(1983) 76 Cr. App. R. 279, to hold, in the circumstances, that the act of the appellant caused t......
-
Juma'at bin Samad v Public Prosecutor
...(refd) R v Gatt [1963] Crim L R 426 (refd) R v Goh Boon Kwan [1955] MLJ 120 (distd) R v Gray (1908) 1 Cr App R 154 (refd) R v Jordan (1956) 40 Cr App R 152 (refd) R v Knox (1927) 20 Cr App R 96 (refd) R v Lattimore (1975) 62 Cr App R 53 (refd) R v Lee [1984] 1 WLR 578 (refd) R v Parks [1961......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Case Note
...circumstances … subject to … exceptional circumstances, that the court is ever willing to listen to additional evidence”: R v Jordan (1956) 40 Cr App R 152, followed in Malaysia in such cases as Mohamed bin Jamal v Public Prosecutor [1964] MLJ 254 and Mohamad Jamil bin Che Din v Public Pros......
-
Rape: Consent
...would appear to have been where the third-partyaction was either completely separate from the original harm inflicted (Rv Jordan (1956) 40 Cr App R 152) or completely unforeseeable (R vRoberts (1971) 56 Cr App R 95; R v Pagett (1983) 76 Cr App R 279). Thesecond appeal of Kennedy ((No. 2) [......
-
Gross Negligence Manslaughter Revisited: Time for a Change of Direction?
...medical treatment because of a failure to read patient notes would no longer be a novus actus interveniens in rare cases like Jordan (1956) 40 Cr App R 152. 161. A. Merry, and A. McCall, ‘Errors, Medicine and the Law’ (Cambridge University Press, Oxford 2001).162. [2016] EWCA Crim 741.163. ......