R v Judge of City of London Court
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 18 December 1891 |
| Date | 18 December 1891 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
69 cases
-
Eschersheim, The (Dortmund, Erkowit, Jade, Salus (formerly Rotesand))
...was exercisable in rem at that date by the High Court of Admiralty or after 1875 until 1920 by the High Court of Justice. In R. v. Judge of City of London Court [1892] 1 Q.B. 273 Lord Esher in the Court of Appeal expressed the view that Parliament should be presumed not to have intended to ......
-
Barnes and Barnes v the Minister of the Environment 1991 Civil Jur No 45 1991 Civil Jur No. 280
...UnionUNK [1971] 1 All ER 1148 R v Herfordshire CC ex parte Cheung, The Times 4 April 1986 R v City of London Court Judge and PayneELR [1892] 1 QB 273 R v Devon CC ex parte Baker, The Times 21 January 1993 Attorney General of Hong Kong v Ng Yuen ShiuUNK [1983]2 All ER 346 R v Secretary of St......
-
DPP v P. McC
...rule of interpretation. There is authority that this should be applied even if the result be absurd. Thus Esher L.J. said in R. v. Judge of City of London Court [1892] 1 Q.B. 273 at p. 290:- "If the words of an Act are clear, you must follow them, even though they lead to a manifest absurd......
-
Greenweb Ltd v Wandsworth London Borough Council
...enough that the words, though clear, lead to a “manifest absurdity”: per Lord Esher M.R. in Reg. v. Judge of the City of London Court [1892] 1 Q.B. 273, 290. Lord Atkinson put the point starkly in Vacher & Sons Ltd. v. London Society of Compositors [1913] A.C. 107, 121: “If the language......
Get Started for Free
7 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...2004), 1197 Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co., 455 U.S. 422, 102 S.Ct. 1148, 71 L.Ed.2d 265 (1982), 1102, 1300 London Court Judge, City of v. Regina, 1 Q.B. 273 (1892), Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock, 187 U.S. 553, 23 S.Ct. 216, 47 L.Ed. 299 (1903), 737 Looney v. Crane Co., 245 U.S. 178, 38 S.Ct. 85, 62......
-
Preliminary Sections
...R. v. City of London Court Judge (1892) 1 Q.B. 273 at 290. .......93 R. v. Gilmore (1961) N.Z.L.R. 384. 78 70 R. v. Hycienth Egbe 13 W.A.C.A. 105 .............................................................. 192 R. v. Inyang (1946) 12 W.A.C.A. 5. R. v. Marsham, Ex Parte Lawrence (1912) K.B......
-
Agency
...would have to re-write the whole of Section 14 of Decree No. 6 of 1999. That I ought not to do. In R. v. Judge of City of London Court (1892) 1 Q.B. 273 at 290 Lord Esther M.R. said: - “If the words of an Act are clear, you must follow them, even though they lead to a manifest absurdity. Th......
-
Statutory Interpretation
...be ineffectual or surplusage). 13 Shannon Realties Ltd v Ville de St Michel , [1924] AC 185 (PC). 14 R v Judge of City of London Court , [1892] 1 QB 273 (CA) (whether amount received from employer for completing course constituted a “prize”). See also Gill v Donald Humberstone & Co , [1963]......
Get Started for Free