R v Judge of City of London Court
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
| Judgment Date | 18 December 1891 |
| Date | 18 December 1891 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
43 cases
-
Eschersheim, The (Dortmund, Erkowit, Jade, Salus (formerly Rotesand))
...was exercisable in rem at that date by the High Court of Admiralty or after 1875 until 1920 by the High Court of Justice. In R. v. Judge of City of London Court [1892] 1 Q.B. 273 Lord Esher in the Court of Appeal expressed the view that Parliament should be presumed not to have intended to ......
-
Barnes and Barnes v the Minister of the Environment 1991 Civil Jur No 45 1991 Civil Jur No. 280
...UnionUNK [1971] 1 All ER 1148 R v Herfordshire CC ex parte Cheung, The Times 4 April 1986 R v City of London Court Judge and PayneELR [1892] 1 QB 273 R v Devon CC ex parte Baker, The Times 21 January 1993 Attorney General of Hong Kong v Ng Yuen ShiuUNK [1983]2 All ER 346 R v Secretary of St......
-
DPP v P. McC
...rule of interpretation. There is authority that this should be applied even if the result be absurd. Thus Esher L.J. said in R. v. Judge of City of London Court [1892] 1 Q.B. 273 at p. 290:- "If the words of an Act are clear, you must follow them, even though they lead to a manifest absurd......
-
DPP v Murphy
...203 ART 26 OF THE CONSTITUTION & IN THE MATTER OF EMPLOYMENT EQUALITY BILL 1996, IN RE 1997 2 IR 321 R V JUDGE OF CITY OF LONDON COURT 1892 1 QB 273 RIVER WEAR COMMISSIONERS V ADAMSON 1877 2 AC 743 NESTOR V MURPHY 1979 IR 326 HEYDENS CASE 1584 3 CO REP 7 PEPPER V HART 1993 1 AER 42 KILLE......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...2004), 1197 Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co., 455 U.S. 422, 102 S.Ct. 1148, 71 L.Ed.2d 265 (1982), 1102, 1300 London Court Judge, City of v. Regina, 1 Q.B. 273 (1892), Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock, 187 U.S. 553, 23 S.Ct. 216, 47 L.Ed. 299 (1903), 737 Looney v. Crane Co., 245 U.S. 178, 38 S.Ct. 85, 62......
