R v Karen Neuberg

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
JudgeLord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, CJ
Judgment Date15 December 2016
Neutral Citation[2016] EWCA Crim 1927
Docket NumberCase No: 2016/01094/C1
Date15 December 2016

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • R (London Borough of Haringey) v Boruch Roth
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 24 July 2020
    ...set in the context of the facts of the case.” That has been repeatedly confirmed in subsequent decisions. Indeed, in Neuberg (No.2) [2016] EWCA Crim 1927, [2017] 4 WLR 58 Lord Thomas LCJ endorsed at paragraph 27 of his judgment the remarks made in the earlier decision of Palmer [2016] EW......
  • The Queen of on the Application of Ashley Charles v Criminal Cases Review Commission
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 25 May 2017
    ...vi) Though the decisions of the CCRC, whether or not to refer cases to the CACD, clearly are subject to judicial review (see recently, R v Neuberg [2016] EWCA Crim 1927, at [52]–[53]): (1) the CCRC should not be vexed with inappropriate applications impacting on scarce resources; the Court'......
  • R v Adrian Weintroub
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 12 December 2017
    ...At the same time the CCRC referred on identical grounds a separate and distinct application to this court in the case of R v Karen Neuberg [2016] EWCA Crim 1927. That application was dismissed by the Full Court on 15th December 2016. Specifically, Lord Thomas CJ of Cwmgiedd had this to say ......
  • R Paul Cleeland v Criminal Cases Review Commission
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 11 January 2022
    ...decisions of the CCRC, whether or not to refer cases to the CACD, clearly are subject to judicial review (see recently, R v. Neuberg [2016] EWCA Crim 1927, at [52]–[53]): (1) the CCRC should not be vexed with inappropriate applications impacting on scarce resources; the Court's scrutiny at......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Confiscation Following Unlawful Re-Use Of Company Names
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 18 January 2017
    ...period of illegal trading. This would be in addition to any fine or prison sentence handed down as a punitive element. R v Neuberg [2016] EWCA Crim 1927 The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your sp......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT