R v Kent Justices, ex parte Crittenden

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtQueen's Bench Division
Year1963
Date1963

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • Hartnell v Minister of Housing and Local Government
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
  • Wyre Forest District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 22 February 1990
    ... ... Holt & Co. v. Collyer ( 1881 ) 16 Ch. D. 718 ... Reg. v. Kent Justices, Ex parte Crittenden [ 1964 ] 1 Q.B. 144 ; [ 1963 ] 2 ... ...
  • Esdell Caravan Parks Ltd v Hemel Hempstead Rural District Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 4 November 1965
    ...much. They have imposed conditions limiting the number of caravans, instead of leaving it to the Site Authority. That happened both in Crittenden's case, 1964, 1 Queen's Bench, p. 144, and in Hartnell's case, 1965, 2 Weekly Law Reports, p. 474. In each of those cases the owner had, by rea......
  • Haytop Country Park Ltd v Amber Valley Borough Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 12 November 2025
    ...areas of the site which may be used for the stationing of caravans. 88 This point was considered by the Divisional Court in R v Kent Justices ex parte Crittenden [1964] 1 QB 144. Planning permission was granted for the use of land as a caravan site, subject to a condition limiting the numbe......
  • Get Started for Free