R v Ketteridge
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1915 |
| Year | 1915 |
| Court | Court of Criminal Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
24 cases
- R v Twiss
-
DPP v M.K.
...PRIME 1973 57 CAR 632 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1948 S35(4) (UK) REGINA v ALEXANDER 1974 1 WLR 422 REX v NEAL 1949 2 KB 590 KING v KETTERIDGE 1915 1 KB 467 DPP v CAMPBELL UNREP CCA 4.3.2005 CHARLETON OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON 322 DPP v REID 1993 2 IR 186 1991 ILT 111 KING v BASKERVILLE 1916 2 ......
-
Ritch v R
...549; [1975] 1 All E.R. 760; (1975), 119 Sol. Jo. 255; 60 Cr. App. R. 266; [1975] Crim. L.R. 656, considered. (8) R. v. Ketteridge, [1915] 1 K.B. 467; [1914–15] All E.R. Rep. 482; (1914), 112 L.T. 783; 84 L.J.K.B. 352; 31 T.L.R. 115; 59 Sol. Jo. 163;79J.P.216;24Cox, C.C. 678; 11 Cr. App. R. ......
-
R v McClenaghan (Fred)
...now permits the jury to purchase reasonable refreshment at their own expense during the course of their retirement. (b) In Ketteridge [1915] 1 KB 467, where one of the jurors by mistake did not go to the jury room on retirement but left the court and was on his own for some 15 minutes befor......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...413 Harrods v. Dow Jones and Company, [2003] EWHC 1162 ............... 109, 110, 111, 117, 119, 234 Haynes v. DeBeck (1914), 31 T.L.R. 115 ................................................................................280, 282 Hays v. Weiland (1918), 42 O.L.R. 637 (C.A.) ........................
-
Publication and Republication
...citing Vizetelly v. Mudie's Select Library Limited, [1900] 2 Q.B. 170; Smith v. Streatfeild, [1913] 3 K.B. 764; Haynes v. DeBeck (1914), 31 T.L.R. 115. The burden of proving the facts essential to this defence rest on the defendant. Menear v. Miguna (1997), 33 O.R. (3d) 223 at 223 (Ont. C.A......
-
Defence of Innocent Dissemination at Common Law
...citing Vizetelly v. Mudie’s Select Library Limited, [1900] 2 Q.B. 170; Smith v. Streatfeild, [1913] 3 K.B. 764; Haynes v. De-Beck (1914), 31 T.L.R. 115. he burden of proving the facts essential to this defence rest on the defendant. Menear v. Miguna (1997), 33 O.R. (3d) 223 at 223 (Ont. C.A......
-
Reigniting the Lamp: The Case for Including People who are Blind or Deaf as Jurors
...Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) s 47(2). 122 Lyons , above n 9, [33] ( French CJ, Bell, Keane and Nettle JJ) . 123 R v Ketteridge (1916) 11 Cr App R 54, 57, affd R v Neal (1949) 33 Cr App R 189 , 193. 2017] The Case for Including People who are Blind or Deaf as Jurors 45 private’. 124 Even wh......