R v Khan (Sultan)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtHouse of Lords
Judgment Date02 July 1996
Date02 July 1996

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
89 cases
  • R v K
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 28 July 2009
    ... ... 402 (evidence obtained through activities of an alleged agent provocateur) and R v Khan [1997] A.C. 558 (evidence obtained by covert means). It is right to say, however, that there is nothing in the present case to suggest that the ... ...
  • McNally v RG Manufacturing
    • United Kingdom
    • County Court
    • Invalid date
  • Phipps (Donald) v R
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • 30 July 2010
    ...heavily on the well known decision of the House of Lords in R v Sang [1979] 3 WLR 26, and also on the later decision in R v Sultan Khan [1996] 3 WLR 162, both of which established the principle, he submitted, that evidence even if illegally obtained remained admissible once it satisfied th......
  • Michael Noel James Hosking and Marie Angela Hosking v Simon Runting and
    • New Zealand
    • Court of Appeal
    • 25 March 2004
    ...gross, does not entitle him to relief in English law. [24] Similar expressions of dissatisfaction are to be found in R v Khan (Sultan) [1997] AC 558; Schering Chemicals Ltd v Falkman Ltd [1982] QB 1; and Morris v Beardmore [1981] AC Despite the resistance to breach of privacy at common law,......
  • Get Started for Free
16 books & journal articles
  • ‘If a Picture Paints a Thousand Words’: The Development of Human Identification Techniques in Forensic Anthropology and Their Implications for Human Rights in the Criminal Process
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 17-2, January 2013
    • 1 January 2013
    ...Amendment?’ (2007) 41 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 385.45 But see Birse vHM Advocate 2000 JC 503, discussed further below.46 [1996] 3 WLR 162.47 Khan vUnited Kingdom (2001) 31 EHRR 1016.48 A. Brown, Criminal Evidence and Procedure, 3rd edn (Avizandum: Edinburgh, 2010) 49.49 (1995) 21 EH......
  • Subject Index
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 7-4, December 2003
    • 1 December 2003
    ...v Gates, 215 F3d 825 (8th Cir2000) .................................................22Khan v United Kingdom [1995] QB 27;[1997] AC 558; (2000) 31 EHRR 1016;[2000] Crim LR 684 .... 44, 45, 49, 111Khan v United Kingdom (2001) 31EHRR 45........ 137, 138, 139, 140, 141Khaw Cheng Bok v Khaw Chen......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 11-4, October 2007
    • 1 October 2007
    ...CCC(3d) 92, SCC. . . . . . . . . . 110, 213, 216, 217, 220R v Khan [1995] QB 27 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79R v Khan [1996] 3 All ER 289. . . . . . . . . . . . 79, 80,82, 83, 202366 E & PTABLE OF CASES THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE & PROOF 367TABLE OF CASESR v Khelaw......
  • Public policy and private illegality in the pursuit of evidence
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 21-1-2, January 2017
    • 1 January 2017
    ...UKHL 53 at [12].125. RvChalkley and Jeffries [1998] QB 848.126. RvKeenan [1990] 2 QB 54 CA.127. RvLoosely [2001] UKHL 53 at [12]; RvKhan [1997] AC 558 at 571.128. RvChalkley and Jeffries [1998] QB 848 at 875.108 The International Journal of Evidence & Proof In RvKhan,129the police, without ......
  • Get Started for Free