R v Khan (Sultan)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date02 July 1996
Date02 July 1996
CourtHouse of Lords
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
99 cases
  • R v K
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 28 July 2009
    ...applied in subsequent cases, including R v Sang [1980] A.C. 402 (evidence obtained through activities of an alleged agent provocateur) and R v Khan [1997] A.C. 558 (evidence obtained by covert means). It is right to say, however, that there is nothing in the present case to suggest that the......
  • McNally v RG Manufacturing
    • United Kingdom
    • County Court
    • Invalid date
  • Phipps (Donald) v R
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • 30 July 2010
    ...heavily on the well known decision of the House of Lords in R v Sang [1979] 3 WLR 26, and also on the later decision in R v Sultan Khan [1996] 3 WLR 162, both of which established the principle, he submitted, that evidence even if illegally obtained remained admissible once it satisfied th......
  • DPP v Cash
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 28 March 2007
    ...CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 2003 S2 EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 2003 S3 SCHENK v SWITZERLAND 1988 13 EHRR 242 R v KHAN 1997 1 AC 558 HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 (UK) AG'S REF (NO 3 OF 1999) 2001 2 AC 91 R v SHAHEED 2002 NZLR 377 CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOURTH A......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
29 books & journal articles
  • ‘If a Picture Paints a Thousand Words’: The Development of Human Identification Techniques in Forensic Anthropology and Their Implications for Human Rights in the Criminal Process
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 17-2, January 2013
    • 1 January 2013
    ...Amendment?’ (2007) 41 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 385.45 But see Birse vHM Advocate 2000 JC 503, discussed further below.46 [1996] 3 WLR 162.47 Khan vUnited Kingdom (2001) 31 EHRR 1016.48 A. Brown, Criminal Evidence and Procedure, 3rd edn (Avizandum: Edinburgh, 2010) 49.49 (1995) 21 EH......
  • Criminal Evidence and Computer Technology
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Cyber Crime - Law and Practice Contents
    • 29 August 2019
    ...unless its quality was or might have been affected by the way in which it was obtained. As we have said, the House of Lords in R v Khan [1997] AC 558 has applied the same test to section 78. All their Lordships were of the view that, regardless of a possible impropriety in the form of an ap......
  • Subject Index
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 7-4, December 2003
    • 1 December 2003
    ...v Gates, 215 F3d 825 (8th Cir2000) .................................................22Khan v United Kingdom [1995] QB 27;[1997] AC 558; (2000) 31 EHRR 1016;[2000] Crim LR 684 .... 44, 45, 49, 111Khan v United Kingdom (2001) 31EHRR 45........ 137, 138, 139, 140, 141Khaw Cheng Bok v Khaw Chen......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Cyber Crime - Law and Practice Contents
    • 29 August 2019
    ...R v Joslin [2010] EWCA Crim 2430 157 R v Junaid Hussain, 27 July 2012 (sentence), unreported, Southwark Crown Court 12 R v Khan (Sultan) [1997] AC 558, [1996] 3 WLR 162, [1996] 3 All ER 289, HL 225 R v Kohn (1979) 69 Cr App R 395, [1979] Crim LR 675, CA 73 R v Land [1999] QB 65, [1998] 3 WL......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT