R v Khan (Sultan)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 02 July 1996 |
| Date | 02 July 1996 |
| Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
99 cases
-
R v K
...applied in subsequent cases, including R v Sang [1980] A.C. 402 (evidence obtained through activities of an alleged agent provocateur) and R v Khan [1997] A.C. 558 (evidence obtained by covert means). It is right to say, however, that there is nothing in the present case to suggest that the......
- McNally v RG Manufacturing
-
Phipps (Donald) v R
...heavily on the well known decision of the House of Lords in R v Sang [1979] 3 WLR 26, and also on the later decision in R v Sultan Khan [1996] 3 WLR 162, both of which established the principle, he submitted, that evidence even if illegally obtained remained admissible once it satisfied th......
-
Michael Noel James Hosking and Marie Angela Hosking v Simon Runting and
...gross, does not entitle him to relief in English law. [24] Similar expressions of dissatisfaction are to be found in R v Khan (Sultan) [1997] AC 558; Schering Chemicals Ltd v Falkman Ltd [1982] QB 1; and Morris v Beardmore [1981] AC Despite the resistance to breach of privacy at common law,......
Get Started for Free
29 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...CCC(3d) 92, SCC. . . . . . . . . . 110, 213, 216, 217, 220R v Khan [1995] QB 27 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79R v Khan [1996] 3 All ER 289. . . . . . . . . . . . 79, 80,82, 83, 202366 E & PTABLE OF CASES THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE & PROOF 367TABLE OF CASESR v Khelaw......
-
Subject Index
...v Gates, 215 F3d 825 (8th Cir2000) .................................................22Khan v United Kingdom [1995] QB 27;[1997] AC 558; (2000) 31 EHRR 1016;[2000] Crim LR 684 .... 44, 45, 49, 111Khan v United Kingdom (2001) 31EHRR 45........ 137, 138, 139, 140, 141Khaw Cheng Bok v Khaw Chen......
-
Criminal Evidence and Computer Technology
...unless its quality was or might have been affected by the way in which it was obtained. As we have said, the House of Lords in R v Khan [1997] AC 558 has applied the same test to section 78. All their Lordships were of the view that, regardless of a possible impropriety in the form of an ap......
-
Public policy and private illegality in the pursuit of evidence
...UKHL 53 at [12].125. RvChalkley and Jeffries [1998] QB 848.126. RvKeenan [1990] 2 QB 54 CA.127. RvLoosely [2001] UKHL 53 at [12]; RvKhan [1997] AC 558 at 571.128. RvChalkley and Jeffries [1998] QB 848 at 875.108 The International Journal of Evidence & Proof In RvKhan,129the police, without ......
Get Started for Free