R v Lancashire County Council, ex parte Huddleston
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1986 |
| Date | 1986 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
217 cases
-
R (on the application of Mahmood) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
...parties to the proceedings. As regards Respondents, this has been long recognised. In R v Lancashire County Court, ex parte Huddelston [1986] 2 All ER 941, Sir John Donaldson MR observed, at p 4: “ Certainly it is for the applicant to satisfy the Court of his entitlement to judicial review ......
-
The Queen (on the application of David Johnson) v Crown Prosecution Service
...unless the court orders otherwise. Public authorities have a duty of candour to the Court and to the Claimant. In R v Lancashire County Council ex parte Huddleston [1986] 2 All ER 941, Parker LJ said: “… when challenged they should set out fully what they did and why, so far as is necessar......
-
Haroon Marshall and Others v Deputy Governor of Bermuda and Others
...and the Respondents The following cases were referred to in the judgment: R v Lancashire County Council ex parte HuddlestonUNK[1986] 2 All ER 941 R v Civil Service Appeal Board ex parte CunninghamUNK[1991] 4 All ER 410 Carltona v Commissioner of WorksUNK[1943] 2 All ER 560 Whitter v DPPBDLR......
-
Lennox Linton Claimant v Maureen Hyman "Chief Magistrate Ag., District "A", St John's Attorney General (Antigua and Barbuda) Defendants [ECSC]
...a respondent must provide reasons following the grant of leave for judicial review. Reliance was placed on the case of R v Lancashire County Council, ex parte Huddleston [1986] 2 ALL ER 941 a case in which the issue arose for determination as to whether the respondent local authority had a ......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
Appeals
...concerned by what they see as the Secretary of State’s refusal to co-operate. In R v Lancashire County Council, ex parte Huddleston [1986] 2 All ER 941, Sir John Donaldson MR emphasised (at 945) that public law had ‘created a new relationship between the courts and those who derive their au......
-
Table of Cases
...C [1994] 1 FCR 343, [1994] ELR 54, 92 LGR 46, [1993] COD 398, QBD 3.112, 3.184 R v Lancashire County Council, ex parte Huddleston [1986] 2 All ER 941, (1986) 136 NLJ 562, CA 6.46, 6.47 R v Montila (Steven William) [2004] UKHL 50, [2004] 1 WLR 3141, [2005] 1 All ER 113, [2005] 1 Cr App R 26,......
-
Protective Expenses Orders and public interest litigation
...and requiring administrators to follow them,44See the comments of Lord Donaldson, MR in R v Lancashire CC, ex parte Huddleston [1986] 2 All ER 941. the protection of human rights,55See, e.g., Sir John Laws, “Law and Democracy” [1995] Public Law 72. and, perhaps most ambitiously, seeing admi......
-
SHAPING A COMMON LAW DUTY TO GIVE REASONS IN SINGAPORE
...676 at [16]. 19 Cap 129, 2004 Rev Ed. 20[2015] 2 SLR 19. 21Per Ah Seng Robin v Housing and Development Board[2015] 2 SLR 19 at [8]. 22[1986] 2 All ER 941. 23R v Lancashire County Council, ex parte Huddleston[1986] 2 All ER 941 at 945. 24Thong Ah Fat v Public Prosecutor[2012] 1 SLR 676 at [1......