R v Lancashire County Council, ex parte Huddleston
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
| Judgment Date | 1986 |
| Year | 1986 |
| Date | 1986 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
235 cases
-
James Flynn and J.T. Flynn & Company Solicitors v The Commissioner of an Garda Síochána, Ireland and The Attorney General
...[2019] IESC 4 (“ RAS”). At para. 6.9 of his judgment, Clarke C.J. stated: ‘As was noted by Lord Donaldson M.R. in R. v. Lancashire County Council Ex p. Huddleston [1986] 2 All E.R. 941, such parties [i.e. public authorities] should conduct public law litigation “with all cards face upwards......
-
R (on the application of Mahmood) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
...to all parties to the proceedings. As regards Respondents, this has been long recognised. In R v Lancashire County Court, ex parte Huddelston [1986] 2 All ER 941, Sir John Donaldson MR observed, at p 4: “ Certainly it is for the applicant to satisfy the Court of his entitlement to judicial ......
-
Dooley v Patterson Bannon Architects Ltd ; Ocean Point Development Company Ltd [(in Receivership)] v Patterson Bannon Architects Ltd
...approach taken by the Respondent. 64 . With reliance on Saleem and on the decision in the neighbouring jurisdiction in R v. Lancashire County Council ex parte Huddleston [1986] 2 ALL ER 941, the Applicants submit that the Respondent has failed “ to comply with her duty of candour to the Co......
-
The Queen (on the application of David Johnson) v Crown Prosecution Service
...unless the court orders otherwise. Public authorities have a duty of candour to the Court and to the Claimant. In R v Lancashire County Council ex parte Huddleston [1986] 2 All ER 941, Parker LJ said: “… when challenged they should set out fully what they did and why, so far as is necessary......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Protective Expenses Orders and public interest litigation
...and requiring administrators to follow them,44See the comments of Lord Donaldson, MR in R v Lancashire CC, ex parte Huddleston [1986] 2 All ER 941. the protection of human rights,55See, e.g., Sir John Laws, “Law and Democracy” [1995] Public Law 72. and, perhaps most ambitiously, seeing admi......
