R v Leeks
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | MR JUSTICE HOLMAN,LORD JUSTICE KEENE |
| Judgment Date | 06 July 2009 |
| Neutral Citation | [2009] EWCA Crim 1612 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Date | 06 July 2009 |
| Docket Number | No: 200900866/C3 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
J v The Queen
...convictions should accordingly be set aside or (perhaps more appropriately) declared to be invalid. The applicants rely, in particular, on R v Leeks [2009] EWCA Crim 1612; [2010] 1 Cr. App. R. 5, where a guilty plea to a count purportedly added to an indictment (but without any order for a......
-
Jonathan Armbrister v R
...the Appellant Mr. Terry Archer, with Mr. David Cash, Counsel for the Respondent R v Clarke and Another [2008] 2 All ER 665 distinguished R v Leeks [2009] EWCA Crim 1612 applied R v Morais [1983] 3 All ER 161 distinguished R v Newland [1988] QB 402 mentioned Cannonier v Director of Public......
-
Armbrister v R
...Appellant Mr. Terry Archer, with Mr. David Cash, Counsel for the Respondent R v Clarke and Another [2008] 2 All ER 665 distinguished R v Leeks [2009] EWCA Crim 1612 applied R v Morais [1983] 3 All ER 161 distinguished R v Newland [1988] QB 402 mentioned Cannonier v Director of Pu......
-
R v Josephs (Verne Ewan)
...Failure to accomplish it does not invalidate the amendment providing that the judge's order is sufficiently clear. For that proposition see R v Leeks [2009] EWCA Crim 1612. 17 How then are those various propositions to be applied to the existing case? First the judge did have power to commi......