R v Legal Aid Committee No. 1 (London) Legal Aid Area, ex parte Rondel
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1967 |
| Date | 1967 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
Bederev v Ireland
...D. 214, Flower Freight Co. Ltd. v. Hammond[1963] 1 Q.B. 275, Reg. v. Legal Aid Committee No. 1 (London) Legal Aid Area, Ex parte Rondel[1967] 2 Q.B. 482, McDaid v. Judge Sheehy[1991] 1 I.R. 1, Rodgers v. Mangan (Unreported, High Court, Geoghegan J., 15 July 1996), Riordan v. An Taoiseach (N......
-
Gayway Linings Ltd v The Law Society
...in the direction of what I regard as the true construction of section 13(1). 23 In R. v. Legal Aid Committee Ex Parte Rondel, 1967 2 Queen's Bench, 482, a decision of the Divisional Court, Lord Parker (then Lord Chief Justice) said at page 491: "Mr Littman, in his able argument before this......
-
Williams v Giraudy and Bourne
...also cited the following authorities: Harkness v. Bell's Asbestos & Engineering Ltd. [1966] 3 All E.R. 843R. v. Area Committee etc. [1967] 2 All E.R. 419; R. v. Westminister Rent Officer [1973] 3 All E.R. 119. 5 Counsel for the applicant submitted that the decision of the learned judge in r......
-
William Bruce Williams Applicant v Emanuel Henry Giraudy Eudes Bourne Respondents [ECSC]
...He also cited the following authorities Harkness v Bell's Asbestos & Engineering Ltd. (1966) 3 All E.R.843R. V. Area Committee etc. (1967) 2 All E.R.419; R.v Westminster Rent Officer (1973) 3 All E.R.119. 5 Counsel for the applicant submitted that the decision of the learned judge in refusi......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Interpretation Of Statutes
...be construed in the light of what is enacted in the Sections. See: R. v. Legal Aid Committee No. 1 (London) Legal Aid Area ex p. Rondal (1967) 2 Q.B. 482 Cf Lloyed v. Blessey (1969) 2 W.L.R. 310 per Salmon, J at p. 316. For the second theory see Shelley v. L.C.C . (1949) A.C.56 per Lord Ult......