R v Leicester Crown Court, ex parte DPP
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1987 |
Year | 1987 |
Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
R v Chelmsford Crown Court, ex parte Chief Constable of Essex
...it had such jurisdiction. That was followed by this court in a number of subsequent cases of which one was Ashton, R. v. Manchester Crown Court & Others ex parte DPP [1993] 2 W.L.R. 846. On an appeal against the decision of this court in Ashton the House of Lords allowed the appeal and held......
-
Competition Authority v Judge O'Donnell
...IRISH BANKS LTD, RE 1999 3 IR 145 1999 1 ILRM 321 BLANCHFIELD v HARTNETT 2001 1 ILRM 193 R v LEICESTER CROWN COURT, EX PARTE DPP 1987 1 WLR 1371 BRADY v HAUGHTON & ORS UNREP SUPREME 29.7.2005 2005 IESC 54 COMPETITION Investigation Documents seized - Application for retention of seized docum......
-
Bertoli v Malone
...Disclosure Commn. v. Isaacs, [1988] 1 W.L.R. 1043; [1989] 1 All E.R. 137, considered. (4) R. v. Leicester Crown Ct., ex p. D.P.P., [1987] 1 W.L.R. 1371, dicta of Watkins, L.J. applied. (5) R. v. Manchester Crown Ct., ex p. Taylor, [1988] 1 W.L.R. 705. (6) R. v. Race Relations Bd., [1975] 1 ......
-
Barclays Bank Plc (trading as Barclaycard) v Taylor
...is now settled that the "parties" are the police and the bank. The customer of the bank does not have a right to be heard: R. v. Leicester Crown Court ex parte D.P.P. (1987) 1 W.L.R. 1371. Indeed, as was pointed out by Watkins L.J. in that case, it is often desirable that the people whose ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Divisional Court
...notice of the application. In the case of a suspect, who was onlyprospectively a defendant, it was held in RvLeicester CC, ex pDPP[1987]1 WLR 1371, that there is no need to give him notice and, when inthe present case it wassuggested that that case can be distinguished fromone in which (as ......