R v Lewes Justices, ex parte Secretary of State for the Home Department

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1972
Date1972
Year1972
CourtHouse of Lords
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
164 cases
  • D— D—(Married Woman) (Plaintiff (Appellant) The National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (Defendants (Respondents)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 6 Mayo 1976
    ...and decided without the view of the executive arm of government being known to the court. 51After Conway v. Rimmer came Reg v. Lewes Justices. Ex parte Home Secretary (1973) Appeal Cases, page 388, a decision upon which Mr. Bingham strongly 52It was held that the public interest did require......
  • Whittaker v Watler
    • Cayman Islands
    • Court of Appeal (Cayman Islands)
    • 6 Diciembre 1996
    ...(Const.) 949. (7) -R. v. Chief Const. (W. Midlands), ex p. Wiley, [1995] 1 A.C. 274; [1994] 3 All E.R. 420. (8) -Rogers v. Home Secy., [1973] A.C. 388; [1972] 2 All E.R. 1057, distinguished. (9) -Taylor v. Anderton, [1995] 1 W.L.R. 447; [1995] 2 All E.R. 420. Evidence-privilege-public inter......
  • Watler v Whittaker
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 20 Octubre 1995
    ...(6) R. v. Chief Constable of W. Midlands, ex p. Wiley, [1994] 1 W.L.R. 114; [1994] 3 All E.R. 420, considered. (7) Rogers v. Home Secy., [1973] A.C. 388; [1972] 2 All E.R. 1057, distinguished. Evidence-privilege-public interest immunity-court to balance harm to public service of disclosure ......
  • D. (Married Woman) (Respondent) v National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (Appellants)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 2 Febrero 1977
    ...was innocent of the offence. In that case, and in that case only, the balance falls upon the side of disclosure. 18 My Lords, in Reg. v. Lewes Justices [1973] A.C. 388 this House did not hesitate to extend to persons from whom the Gaming Board received information for the purposes of the ex......
  • Get Started for Free
7 books & journal articles
  • Subject Index
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 7-4, December 2003
    • 1 Diciembre 2003
    ...v Fujitsu General NewZealand Ltd (CA61/02) ................ 201Rogers v Home Secretary [1973] AC 388.........................................................123Rosli bin Darus v Mansor @Harun binHj Saad [2001] 4 MLJ 206 .... 234, 235Rowe v Davis (1993) 97 Cr App R 110.............................
  • Public Interest Immunity and Disclosure of Unused Materials in Criminal Proceedings
    • United Kingdom
    • Emerald Journal of Financial Crime No. 7-4, February 2000
    • 1 Febrero 2000
    ...privilege by the Crown if the claim was made in proper form; see also R v Lewes Justices, ex p Secretary of State for the Home Department [1973] AC 388, 400 where Lord Reid said that the expression of Crown privilege was 'wrong and may be misleading'. (2) R v Ward [1993] 2 All ER 577, R v K......
  • State proceedings in the Commonwealth Caribbean
    • Barbados
    • Caribbean Law Review No. 7-2, December 1997
    • 1 Diciembre 1997
    ...of the Crown and do not take orders from the government. As indicated earlier, this question will not arise in the Caribbean. 125 [1973] A.C. 388. It is noteworthy that the Court of Appeal of the East Caribbean States (Sir Vincent Floissac C.J., Byron and Satrohan Singh,JJ.A.) applied this ......
  • The deportation process and the right to be heard in Botswana in the light of Kenneth Good v Botswana
    • South Africa
    • Sabinet Lesotho Law Journal No. 20-1_2, January 2013
    • 1 Enero 2013
    ...was satisfied that he was involved with a specific terrorist organisation. In Rogers v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1973] AC 388 Lord Reid said that the authority dealing with a potential deportee should act in good faith and should, so far as possible tell him the gist of an......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT