R v Lewes Justices, ex parte Secretary of State for the Home Department

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtHouse of Lords
Judgment Date1972
Year1972
Date1972

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
159 cases
  • D— D—(Married Woman) (Plaintiff (Appellant) The National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (Defendants (Respondents)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • May 6, 1976
    ...and decided without the view of the executive arm of government being known to the court. 51After Conway v. Rimmer came Reg v. Lewes Justices. Ex parte Home Secretary (1973) Appeal Cases, page 388, a decision upon which Mr. Bingham strongly 52It was held that the public interest did require......
  • Whittaker v Watler
    • Cayman Islands
    • Court of Appeal (Cayman Islands)
    • December 6, 1996
    ...(Const.) 949. (7) -R. v. Chief Const. (W. Midlands), ex p. Wiley, [1995] 1 A.C. 274; [1994] 3 All E.R. 420. (8) -Rogers v. Home Secy., [1973] A.C. 388; [1972] 2 All E.R. 1057, distinguished. (9) -Taylor v. Anderton, [1995] 1 W.L.R. 447; [1995] 2 All E.R. 420. Evidence-privilege-public inter......
  • Watler v Whittaker
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • October 20, 1995
    ...(6) R. v. Chief Constable of W. Midlands, ex p. Wiley, [1994] 1 W.L.R. 114; [1994] 3 All E.R. 420, considered. (7) Rogers v. Home Secy., [1973] A.C. 388; [1972] 2 All E.R. 1057, distinguished. Evidence-privilege-public interest immunity-court to balance harm to public service of disclosure ......
  • D. (Married Woman) (Respondent) v National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (Appellants)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • February 2, 1977
    ...was innocent of the offence. In that case, and in that case only, the balance falls upon the side of disclosure. 18 My Lords, in Reg. v. Lewes Justices [1973] A.C. 388 this House did not hesitate to extend to persons from whom the Gaming Board received information for the purposes of the ex......
  • Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
  • Subject Index
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 7-4, December 2003
    • December 1, 2003
    ...v Fujitsu General NewZealand Ltd (CA61/02) ................ 201Rogers v Home Secretary [1973] AC 388.........................................................123Rosli bin Darus v Mansor @Harun binHj Saad [2001] 4 MLJ 206 .... 234, 235Rowe v Davis (1993) 97 Cr App R 110.............................
  • State proceedings in the Commonwealth Caribbean
    • Barbados
    • Caribbean Law Review No. 7-2, December 1997
    • December 1, 1997
    ...of the Crown and do not take orders from the government. As indicated earlier, this question will not arise in the Caribbean. 125 [1973] A.C. 388. It is noteworthy that the Court of Appeal of the East Caribbean States (Sir Vincent Floissac C.J., Byron and Satrohan Singh,JJ.A.) applied this ......
  • The deportation process and the right to be heard in Botswana in the light of Kenneth Good v Botswana
    • South Africa
    • Sabinet Lesotho Law Journal No. 20-1_2, January 2013
    • January 1, 2013
    ...was satisfied that he was involved with a specific terrorist organisation. In Rogers v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1973] AC 388 Lord Reid said that the authority dealing with a potential deportee should act in good faith and should, so far as possible tell him the gist of an......
  • Disclosure of information, public interest immunity and the privilege against self-incrimination in the british Virgin Islands
    • Barbados
    • Caribbean Law Review No. 9-1, June 1999
    • June 1, 1999
    ...as to whether the privilege can be claimed is now a matter for determination by the court. 28 This may sound unremarkable until it is 25 [1973] A. C 388. 26 Ibid., at p. 400, per Lord Reid; at p. 406, per Lord Pearson; at p. 406-7, per Lord Simon of Glaisdale and at p. 412, per Lord Salmon.......