R v Lewes Justices, ex parte Secretary of State for the Home Department
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judgment Date | 1972 |
Date | 1972 |
Year | 1972 |
Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Start Your 7-day Trial
164 cases
-
D— D—(Married Woman) (Plaintiff (Appellant) The National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (Defendants (Respondents)
...and decided without the view of the executive arm of government being known to the court. 51After Conway v. Rimmer came Reg v. Lewes Justices. Ex parte Home Secretary (1973) Appeal Cases, page 388, a decision upon which Mr. Bingham strongly 52It was held that the public interest did require......
-
Whittaker v Watler
...(Const.) 949. (7) -R. v. Chief Const. (W. Midlands), ex p. Wiley, [1995] 1 A.C. 274; [1994] 3 All E.R. 420. (8) -Rogers v. Home Secy., [1973] A.C. 388; [1972] 2 All E.R. 1057, distinguished. (9) -Taylor v. Anderton, [1995] 1 W.L.R. 447; [1995] 2 All E.R. 420. Evidence-privilege-public inter......
-
Watler v Whittaker
...(6) R. v. Chief Constable of W. Midlands, ex p. Wiley, [1994] 1 W.L.R. 114; [1994] 3 All E.R. 420, considered. (7) Rogers v. Home Secy., [1973] A.C. 388; [1972] 2 All E.R. 1057, distinguished. Evidence-privilege-public interest immunity-court to balance harm to public service of disclosure ......
-
D. (Married Woman) (Respondent) v National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (Appellants)
...was innocent of the offence. In that case, and in that case only, the balance falls upon the side of disclosure. 18 My Lords, in Reg. v. Lewes Justices [1973] A.C. 388 this House did not hesitate to extend to persons from whom the Gaming Board received information for the purposes of the ex......
Get Started for Free
7 books & journal articles
-
Subject Index
...v Fujitsu General NewZealand Ltd (CA61/02) ................ 201Rogers v Home Secretary [1973] AC 388.........................................................123Rosli bin Darus v Mansor @Harun binHj Saad [2001] 4 MLJ 206 .... 234, 235Rowe v Davis (1993) 97 Cr App R 110.............................
-
Public Interest Immunity and Disclosure of Unused Materials in Criminal Proceedings
...privilege by the Crown if the claim was made in proper form; see also R v Lewes Justices, ex p Secretary of State for the Home Department [1973] AC 388, 400 where Lord Reid said that the expression of Crown privilege was 'wrong and may be misleading'. (2) R v Ward [1993] 2 All ER 577, R v K......
-
State proceedings in the Commonwealth Caribbean
...of the Crown and do not take orders from the government. As indicated earlier, this question will not arise in the Caribbean. 125 [1973] A.C. 388. It is noteworthy that the Court of Appeal of the East Caribbean States (Sir Vincent Floissac C.J., Byron and Satrohan Singh,JJ.A.) applied this ......
-
The deportation process and the right to be heard in Botswana in the light of Kenneth Good v Botswana
...was satisfied that he was involved with a specific terrorist organisation. In Rogers v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1973] AC 388 Lord Reid said that the authority dealing with a potential deportee should act in good faith and should, so far as possible tell him the gist of an......
Get Started for Free