R v Lillyman
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1896 |
| Year | 1896 |
| Court | Court for Crown Cases Reserved |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
128 cases
- R v Velayuthan
- Kilby v R
-
R v Spooner; R v S
...& Tapper on Evidence, 9 th edition, at page 273), the foundation of the modern law relevant to the issue before us was established in R v Lillyman [1896] 2 QBD 167. In that case, evidence of a contemporaneous complaint by the complainant to her employer was admitted against two objections –......
- R; Vellasamy
Request a trial to view additional results
11 books & journal articles
-
Subject Index
...[1996] CrimLR 825, CA ......................................... 136, 286R v Lee [2005] EWCA Crim 443 ..................23 2R v Lillyman [1896] 2 QB 167....................... 24 8R v Liristis [2004] NSWCCA 287 ...................6 6R v Looseley, Attorney-General’s Reference(No. 3 of 2000) [......
-
Female Rape—An Ongoing Concern: Strategies for Improving Reporting and Conviction Levels
...previous record. However it has alwaysbeen recognised that in specific circumstances bad character evidence isadmissible.83 R vLillyman [1896] 2 QB 167.84 [1905] 1 KB 551.The Journal of Criminal Prior to s. 101 of the CJA 2003, there were common law and statutoryrules governing the admissi......
-
Closing the Credibility Gap: The Prosecutorial Use of Expert Witness Testimony in Sexual Assault Cases
...Press: Cambridge, MA, 1979).59 The doctrine of recent complaint operates as an exception to the rule against narrative; R vLillyman [1896] 2 QB 167, R v Valentine [1996] 2 Cr App R 213, R v Birks [2003] 2 Cr App R 7. Seenow Criminal Justice Act 2003, s. 120(7). For critical comment see K. S......
-
Exploring rape conviction rates: consent, false allegations and legal obstacles
...compassionate legal reasoning. While the idea of ‘hue and 53 The People (DPP) v Brophy [1992] ILRM 709 [37]-[42]. See also R v Lillyman [1896] 2 QB 167 and R v Osborne [1905] 1 KB 551 for an understanding of the origin of the offence. 54 Brian Foley, ‘The Doctrine of Recent Complaint Revisi......
Request a trial to view additional results