R v Liverpool City Justices, ex parte Topping
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1983 |
| Year | 1983 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
92 cases
5 books & journal articles
-
Divisional Court
...for justices to see that list. The Divisional Court decided not to follow the case of R. v. Liverpool City Justices, ex p. Topping [1983] 1 All E.R. 490, by being able to distinguish that case on a technical point. Full understanding of the decision in the present case can only be achieved ......
-
Divisional Court
...and seeing what has gone on would have areasonablesuspicion that a fair trial was not possible (see R v Liverpool City JJ, ex pTopping [1983] 1WLR119, 123H), the court held that justice was notseen to be done on this occasion and the convictions and consequent orderswere quashed. As Rose Ja......
-
Judicial Bias and Disqualification after Pinochet (No. 2)
...and New Zealand, most recently in RvAltrincham Justices, ex Parte N Pennington [1975] QB 549; RvLiverpool City Justices, ex ParteTopping [1983] 1 WLR 119; RvMulvihill [1990] 1 WLR 438; Webb vThe Queen (1994) 181 CLR41. See I. Bing, ‘Curing Bias in Criminal Trials – the Consequences of RvGou......
-
Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
...Committee, having found thefirst group of cases proved, would have been biased on hearingthe second: see R v Liverpool JJ, ex p Topping[1983]1 WLR119. The Board doubted, however, whether the criminal testshould be applied, since it had been seriously called in question'in the House of Lords......
Request a trial to view additional results