R v Liverpool Juvenile Court, ex parte R
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1987 |
| Date | 1987 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
Fernandes v Governor of HMP Brixton
...under ss 76 and/or 78 of PACE, they were obliged to determine the objections forthwith by holding a trial within a trial (see R v Liverpool Juvenile Court, ex p R [1987] 2 All ER 668, [1988] QB 1. It was common ground before us that that this was therefore the procedure that the magistrate......
- Re Proulx
-
Shadrach Gibson v R
...UKPC 21 applied Benjamin and another v The State (2012) 82 WIR 445 applied Jogee and Ruddock v R [2016] UKPC 7 applied R v Liverpool Juvenile Court, ex parte R [1988] Q.B. 1 applied R v Mushtaq [2005] UKHL applied per Barnett, JA (Actg): The direction given in the present case is fatally f......
-
Jahvid Absolam v R
...was a decision of the Divisional Court, and was an appeal by way of case stated. Lord Lane CJ's explanation was quoted in R v Liverpool Juvenile Court, ex parte R [1987] 2 All ER 668, on page 671, as saying, in part: “…But where the matter is being conducted by the magistrates' court, then......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Court of Appeal
...representation for these purposes. There was refer-ence to limited guidance offered by Russell LJ in R v Liverpool JuvenileCourt, ex p. R [1988] QB 1 at 10H and 11A, where it was decided that‘representation’ is not the same as suggestions of an improperly ob-tained confession during The sec......
-
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE 2010
...magistrates trials: see F (an infant) v Chief Constable of Kent[1982] Crim LR 682 (DC) and rebutted in Liverpool Juvenile Court, ex parte R[1988] QB 1. 97 Section 279 of the Criminal Procedure Code 2010 (Act 15 of 2010) and illustrations (c) and (d) clearly mandate that there must be a voir......
-
‘Take it from Me…’—The Roles of the Judge and Lay Assessors in Deciding Questions of Law in Appeals to the Crown Court
...I am particularly grateful to Professor Sullivan for his comments on this point.10 See, e.g., Rv Liverpool Juvenile Court, ex p. R [1988] QB 1.11 See, e.g., Sprack, above n. 1 at 9.74.12 See, e.g., P. Darbyshire, ‘Magistrates’, in M. McConville and Wilson (eds), TheHandbook of the Criminal ......