R v Llewellyn-Jones
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judge | THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE |
Judgment Date | 26 January 1967 |
Judgment citation (vLex) | [1967] EWCA Crim J0126-1 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
Docket Number | No. 2680/66 |
Date | 26 January 1967 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
22 cases
-
R v Cosford and Others
...Crim 1179); prison visitors ( Belton above); magistrates ( Pinney (1832) 3 B & Ad 947); county court registrars (now district judges) ( Llewellyn-Jones [1968] 1 QB 429); local councillors ( Speechley [2004] EWCA Crim 3067); some local authority employees ( Bowden above); army officers ( Whi......
-
R v Bowden
...paid out of a fund provided by the public." 24 The Lyme case was cited in argument by the Attorney-General, Sir John Simon QC. 25 In R v Llewellyn-Jones (1967) 51 Cr App R 204, the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) (Lord Parker CJ, Winn LJ and Willis J) heard an appeal against conviction ......
-
R v Belton
...was only if a person received payment from public money that he could be a public officer. 23 We were further referred to the case of R v Llewellyn-Jones [1967] 51 Cr App R 2004 concerning a County Court Registrar. With respect we do not get anything more from this case than the reluctance ......
-
R v Dytham
...or oblique motive. This was the position for example in R. v. Benbridge (1783) 3 Douglas. 327; and also in the modern case of R. v. Llewellyn-Jones and Lougher (1967) 51 Cr. App. R.4. There the Registrar of a County Court was charged in a count which alleged that he had made an order in rel......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
-
Regulating the Conduct of MPs. The British Experience of Combating Corruption
...ER 1180, HL; R. v. Bembridge (1783) 3 Doug 327, 99 ER 679; R. v. Dytham [1979] QB 722;R. v. Hall [1891] 1 QB 747; R. v. Llewellyn-Jones [1968] 1 QB 429; R. v. Whitaker [1914] 3 KB 1283.9R. v. Vaughan (1769) 4 Burr. 2494.10 R. v. Vaughan, supra.11 R. v. Lancaster and Worrall (1890) 16 Cox 73......
-
Misconduct in a Public Office—Should it Still Be Prosecuted?
...310, see below.5 Bribery Act 2010, ss 1 and 2.6 D. Lusty, ‘Misconduct in Public Office’ (2009) 173 Criminal Law & Justice Weekly 437.7 [1968] 1 QB 429, CA. 8 [1979] 2 QB 722, CA.9 Ibid. at 727.10 Fraud Act 2006, s. 4.11 [2004] EWCA Crim 868, [2005] QB 73.The Journal of Criminal a semi-face......
-
Offences concerning directors and officers of a company. Fraud and corruption in the United Kingdom – the present and the future
...Law Commission Final Report and Draft Bill No. 248.Law Commission (2002), The Law Commission’s Final Report No. 276.Rv. Llewellyn- Jones (1968), 1 QB 429, Rv. Llewellyn- Jones.Rider, A. (2003), “Murky world”, Comp Law, Vol. 24 No. 7, p. 193.Salomon v. A. Salomon & Co. Ltd (1897), AC 22, Sal......
-
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
...Reference (No. 3 of 2003), two of the oldcases are then considered specifically by the Court of Appeal. First, R vLlewellyn-Jones [1968] 1 QB 429 is considered to the extent that the factswere that a county court registrar exercised his judicial authority to gainan improper personal finan......
Request a trial to view additional results