R v Lovitt

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1912
Year1912
CourtPrivy Council
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
32 cases
  • English, Scottish and Australian Bank Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 15 d2 Dezembro d2 1931
    ...presumably be, and it was held therefore to be bona notabilia within the area of the local jurisdiction within which he resided." 59In Rex v. Lovitt [1912] A.C. 212 the same principle was again affirmed by the Privy 60It was suggested that the doctrine just enunciated was peculiar to proba......
  • Haque v Haque [No2]
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Richardson v Richardson
    • United Kingdom
    • Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • 12 d4 Maio d4 1927
  • Damayanti Kantilal Doshi v Indian Bank
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 11 d3 Novembro d3 1998
    ...Joachimson v Swiss Bank Corporation [1921] 3 KB 110. For this purpose, branches of a bank are treated as separate entities: R v Lovitt [1912] AC 212 at 219 and Clare & Co v Dresdner Bank [1915] 2 KB 576. 13.Furthermore, in the case of a fixed deposit, repayment is subject to the terms of th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Bank and Customer Law in Canada. Second Edition
    • 19 d3 Junho d3 2013
    ............. 328 R. v. Linhart (1989), 9 W.C.B. (2d) 246 (Ont. H.C.J.) ........................................ 382 R. v. Lovitt (1911), [1912] A.C. 212 (P.C.) ............................................156, 157, 246 R. v. Mathur (2007), 162 C.R.R. (2d) 23, [2007] O.J. No. 3592 (S.C.J.) ..........
  • Bank Accounts
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Bank and Customer Law in Canada. Second Edition
    • 19 d3 Junho d3 2013
    ...Scott v. Bank of New Brunswick (1892), 21 S.C.R. 30; Ontario (Attorney General) v. Newman (1901), 1 O.L.R. 511 (C.A.); R . v. Lovitt , [1912] A.C. 212 (P.C.). Bank Accounts 247 any other characteristics for a negotiable instrument in law. 56 A deposit receipt made payable to order was found......
  • Banking Business
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Bank and Customer Law in Canada. Second Edition
    • 19 d3 Junho d3 2013
    ...(C.A.); Bain v. Torrance (1884), 1 Man. R. 32 (Q.B.). 13 Clode v. Bayley (1843), 12 M. & W. 51, 152 E.R. 1107 (Ex. Ch.); R. v. Lovitt , [1912] A.C. 212 (H.L.); Bills of Exchange Act , R.S.C. 1985, c. B-4, s. 50. 14 Woodland v. Fear (1857), 7 El. & B1. 519, 119 E.R. 1339 (Ex. Ch.); Clare & C......
1 forms
  • Chapter IHTM27093
    • United Kingdom
    • HM Revenue & Customs
    • Invalid date
    ...bank account is a debt, and under general law is situated at the branch of the bank where the account is kept: R v Lovitt [1912] AC 212. This general law rule may be modified for Inheritance Tax (IHT) purposes by a Double Taxation Any case where it is claimed that a bank account in the UK m......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT