R v M

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLORD JUSTICE TOULSON,MR JUSTICE BEAN
Judgment Date14 August 2008
Neutral Citation[2008] EWCA Crim 1901
Docket NumberNo: 200803774/B5704270/D4
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Date14 August 2008

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • OB v The Director of the Serious Fraud Office
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 1 Febrero 2012
    ..."as those sections apply in relation to civil proceedings". We return, presently, to consider the ramifications of the terms of s.46. 40 R v M [2008] EWCA Crim 1901 ; [2009] 1 WLR 1179 involved an alleged breach of a POCA restraint order. The prosecution applied to the Crown Court to comm......
  • HM Solicitor General v Ms Sophie Holmes
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 10 Junio 2019
    ...of jurisdiction” and indicated specific limitations on the trial judge's ability to deal with committals for contempt. Similarly, in R v M [2009] 1 WLR 1179, the Court of Appeal (Bean J) said: “There are two possible ways of dealing with criminal contempt: one by the exercise of the summary......
  • R v Lenn Mayhew-Lewis
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 26 Mayo 2022
    ...whose restraint order the defendant is said to have breached, just as would occur in the case of a freezing injunction.” 15 The judgment in R v M considered various other types of contempt application. In the celebrated case of Balogh v Crown Court at St Albans [1973] QB, the appellant had ......
  • Aaron Leathem and Another v R
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 15 Febrero 2017
    ...in the case, and (b) its value for understanding the case as a whole is substantial." 'Impossible or difficult to see without it' 40 In R v. Lee [2012] EWCA 316, Hughes LJ gave helpful guidance as to the application of the s.102 definition in practice. The issue in the case concerned the ju......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT