R v M
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | LORD JUSTICE TOULSON,MR JUSTICE BEAN |
| Judgment Date | 14 August 2008 |
| Neutral Citation | [2008] EWCA Crim 1901 |
| Docket Number | No: 200803774/B5704270/D4 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Date | 14 August 2008 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 cases
-
OB v The Director of the Serious Fraud Office
..."as those sections apply in relation to civil proceedings". We return, presently, to consider the ramifications of the terms of s.46. 40 R v M [2008] EWCA Crim 1901 ; [2009] 1 WLR 1179 involved an alleged breach of a POCA restraint order. The prosecution applied to the Crown Court to comm......
-
HM Solicitor General v Ms Sophie Holmes
...of jurisdiction” and indicated specific limitations on the trial judge's ability to deal with committals for contempt. Similarly, in R v M [2009] 1 WLR 1179, the Court of Appeal (Bean J) said: “There are two possible ways of dealing with criminal contempt: one by the exercise of the summary......
-
R v Lenn Mayhew-Lewis
...whose restraint order the defendant is said to have breached, just as would occur in the case of a freezing injunction.” 15 The judgment in R v M considered various other types of contempt application. In the celebrated case of Balogh v Crown Court at St Albans [1973] QB, the appellant had ......
-
Aaron Leathem and Another v R
...in the case, and (b) its value for understanding the case as a whole is substantial." 'Impossible or difficult to see without it' 40 In R v. Lee [2012] EWCA 316, Hughes LJ gave helpful guidance as to the application of the s.102 definition in practice. The issue in the case concerned the ju......