R v MacDonald
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1928 |
| Year | 1928 |
| Court | Court of Criminal Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
R v Watton
...those matters in this judgment. The case which perhaps is the high water mark of his argument – indeed I think he so described it – is MacDonald 21 Cr. App. R. 26. It would be an understatement to say that it is a very brief report, and I will read it in full: 9 "Application for leave to ap......
-
Sanja Elliot v R
...such an exceptional circumstance as to warrant the granting of bail; see R v Selkirk (1925) 18 Cr App Rep 172, R v MacDonald (1928) 21 Cr App Rep 26, R v Waxman (1930) 22 Cr App Rep 81, R v Stewart (1931) 23 Cr App Rep 68, and The State v Scantlebury (1976) 27 WIR 103. It is otherwise wher......
-
Bonner v R
... ... There is, however, no further indication in the report of what the circumstances were. This case is consequently not of much assistance to this court on the present application ... 24 In Macdonald (1930) 21 Cr. App. R. 26 (which, together with Howeson and Hardy and Davidson, was referred to in Watton) applicant was convicted at the Sheffield Quarter Sessions on July 12 of knowingly receiving stolen property and sentenced to 18 months imprisonment with hard labour. Bail was granted to the ... ...
-
Mariano v R
... ... On the other hand support for counsel's contention appears to exist in a case not cited by him, namely, Macdonald (1930) 21 Cr. App. R. 26 cited in my ruling on the application for bail in Willword Bonner v. Reg. (supra). In Macdonald the applicant was convicted on July 12th of knowingly receiving stolen property and sentenced to 18 months imprisonment with hard labour. His appeal could not be heard until the ... ...