R v Mackinnon

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtHouse of Lords
Date1958
Year1958

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
10 cases
  • Public Prosecutor v Wang Ziyi Able
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 11 March 2008
    ...a dishonest or fraudulent statement, as distinct from one which is made with an honest belief in its truth (see Regina v Mackinnon [1959] 1 QB 150 (“Mackinnon”) at 153). As such, the phrase “does not care whether the statement or information is true or false” in s 199(i) of the SFA equally ......
  • Re Hefferon Kearns Ltd (No. 2)
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 14 January 1993
    ...B.C.L.C. 520. R. v. Bates and Russell [1953] 1 W.L.R. 77. R. v. Grunwald [1961] 2 W.L.R. 606; [1960] 3 All E.R. 380. R. v. MacKinnon [1959] 1 Q.B. 150; [1951] 3 All E.R. 657. Albert E. Reed & Co. Ltd. v. London & Rochester Trading Co. Ltd.[1954] 2 Lloyds Rep. 463. Salomon v. Salomon & Co. L......
  • Commissioner of Taxation v R & D Holdings Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • Invalid date
  • Donovan v Landy's Ltd
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 13 April 1963
    ...350. (5) [1929] A. C. 358. (1) [1961] 2 W. L. R. 606. (2) [1961] 1 W. L. R. 1206. (3) [1952] 2 All E. R. 842; [1953] 1 W. L. R. 77. (1) [1959] 1 Q. B. 150. (2) [1937] A. C. 576, at p. (3) [1954] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 462. (4) [1961] 1 W. L. R. 1206. (1) [1930] A. C. 404. (2) [1937] I. R. 350. (3) ......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • KNOWING, NOT KNOWING AND ALMOST KNOWING: KNOWLEDGE AND THE DOCTRINE OF MENS REA
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2008, December 2008
    • 1 December 2008
    ...AC 932 at 978. 82 [1952] 2 All ER 842. The Prosecution in PP v Able Wang relied on this case in its submissions. 83 [1953] 1 WLR 77. 84 [1959] 1 QB 150. 85 The High Court in PP v Able Wang quoted this passage in its judgment. 86 Securities and Futures Act (Cap 289, 2006 Rev Ed) s 5. 87 [196......