R v Mahomed Farid

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1945
Year1945
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 cases
  • Abubakar bin Ismail v R
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1954
  • DPP v Anthony McCarthy and Others
    • Ireland
    • Court of Criminal Appeal
    • 25 July 2007
    ...parties should not be left to the jury without a warning that it is dangerous to accept it without corroboration. (Rex v Farid 91945) 30 Cr. App. R. 168) In both of these cases (2) and (3) a person not a party or not necessarily a party to the substantive crime charged was treated as an acc......
  • Davies v DPP
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 15 January 1954
    ...so call it) by decisions such as ( R. v. Davies 22 Cr. App. R. 33 (1930)); ( R. v. Lewis 26 Cr. App. R. 110 (1937)); and ( R. v. Farid 30 Cr. App. R. 168): and subject to certain qualifications which I will indicate when dealing with it, the case of Baskerville itself. 14 Tate's case ( su......
  • Lim Toh Sin v Public Prosecutor
    • Singapore
    • Federal Court (Singapore)
    • 10 February 1966
    ...of armed robbery: at [20]. Begu v King Emperor AIR 1925 PC 130 (folld) Quinn and Howland v R [1949] MLJ 217 (folld) R v Farid (1944) 30 Cr App R 168 (folld) R v Haddy [1944] KB 442 (folld) Stirland v Director of Public Prosecutions [1944] AC 315 (folld) Woolmington v Director of Public Pros......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT