R v Maidstone Crown Court, ex parte Lever

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1995
Date1995
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
21 cases
  • R (Stevens) v Truro Magistrates' Court
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 18 July 2001
    ...may be estreated in whole or in part. Butler-Sloss LJ has set out the position succinctly in her judgment in R v Maidstone Crown Court ex p Lever [1995] 1 WLR 928, 930: "The general principle is that the purpose of a recognisance is to bring the defendant to court for trial. The basis of es......
  • Choudhry v Birmingham Crown Court
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 26 October 2007
    ...with a summons." 15 The principles governing the forfeiture of recognizance were reviewed by the Court of Appeal in R v Maidstone Crown Court ex parte Lever and Connell [1996] 1 Cr.App.R 524. They include the following: "(a) The purpose of a recognizance is to bring the defendant to court f......
  • R v Stipendiary Magistrate for Leicestershire and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 13 July 1999
    ...referred to separate consideration being necessary, both to culpability and to the surety's ability to pay in full. 43 In R. v. Maidstone Crown Court, Ex parte Lever, [1995] 1 WLR 928, Butler-Sloss LJ said this at 930F: "The general principle is that the purpose of a recognizance is to brin......
  • R v Stipendiary Magistrate for Leicestershire and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 13 July 1999
    ...referred to separate consideration being necessary, both to culpability and to the surety's ability to pay in full. 40 In R. v. Maidstone Crown Court, Ex parte Lever, [1995] 1 WLR 928, Butler-Sloss LJ said this at 930F: "The general principle is that the purpose of a recognizance is to brin......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT