R v Manchester Crown Court, ex parte McDonald ; R v Leeds Crown Court, ex parte Hunt ; R v Winchester Crown Court, ex parte Forbes ex parte Wilson and Mason
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) |
| Judgment Date | 1999 |
| Year | 1999 |
| Date | 1999 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
93 cases
- R v Worcester Crown Court, ex parte Norman
-
The Law Association of Trinidad and Tobago v Dr. Keith Rowley the Prime Minister of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago
...process by which a decision has been made and not the substance or merits of the decision. R Crown Court at Manchester ex p McDonald [1999] 1 WLR 841. • In some case judicial review courts in determining whether a decision is illogical or irrational, are in reality engaged in a merit based......
-
R (O) v Crown Court at Harrow
...1985 Act and not merely apply the Bail Act was a point made by Lord Bingham of Cornhill CJ in R v Manchester Crown Court, Ex p McDonald [1999] 1 WLR 841, 845-846: "If the law ended at that point [simply with the Bail Act] it would manifestly afford inadequate protection to unconvicted defen......
-
R (Wardle) v Leeds Crown Court
...of the Regulations. 17 It is of coure important to bear in mind the purpose of the statute and the Regulations. In R v Manchester Crown Court, Ex p McDonald [1999] 1 WLR 841 Lord Bingham CJ said, at p 846: "The 1985 Act and the 1987 Regulations, as amended, have three overriding purposes: (......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Cases
...vWarren[1998] RTR 374 140R v Wijs and others[1999] 1 Cr App (S)181 331R vWinchesterCC,ex p B (aMinor)[1999]1 WLR788408Casesex pForbes[1999] 1 All ER 805 309R vWoollin[1998] 3 WLR 382 54R v Yalman [1998] 2 Cr App R269121R vYoung(KennethPatrick)unreported,30April 1999456Reid vSecretaryofState......
-
Time Running Out? Extending Custody Time Limits for Periods of Indeterminate Action
...to “some other good and sufficient cause”sincethe introduction of s 22 POA 1985. In R v Manchester Crown Court, Ex Parte McDonald [1999] 1 WLR841, for example, Lord Bingham CJ explained that the seriousness of the offence with which a defendantis charged cannot of itself be a good and suff......
