R v Martindale
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1966 |
| Year | 1966 |
| Court | Courts-Martial Appeal Court |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
7 cases
-
DPP v MacEoin
...provocation may be established notwithstanding the fact that the accused intended to kill or cause serious injury. R. v. MartindaleWLR [1966] 1 W.L.R. 1564 approved. 2. That, accordingly, the trial of the accused had been unsatisfactory and that there should be a new trial. Semble: In consi......
-
Bholanauth v The State
...an intention to kill and that the principles were correctly stated in that case as well as in the earlier case of Perera. [See also R. v. Martindale [1966] 3 All E.R. 305.] 21 I do not wish it to be thought that I am attempting to expound any new doctrines on excusable homicide perpetrated ......
-
Jacobs v The Queen
...far!” “What I am doing is wrong:” I cannot discern what direction the learned trial judge gave the jury on the law of provocation. See R v. Martindale [1966] 3 All E.R. 305. 45 In my view the learned trial judge gave little or no legal direction on provocation and moreover, the way he dealt......
-
R v Ruth Ellis
...Cases stated the law in these terms at the time and continued to do so until its 35 th edition published in 1962 (see R v Martindale [1966] 1 WLR 1564 at p 1567). 73 The question that we have to address is not whether the Crown's view may have been wrong but whether the judge's ruling was i......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Injustice Perpetuated? The Contribution of the Court of Appeal
...always ameliorate a 31 Holmes v DPP [1946] AC 588, disapproved in Attorney-General for Ceylon v Perera [1953] AC 200; R v Martindale (1966) 50 Cr App R 273. 32 Of course, there is a problem where an unmeritorious applicant takes the benefit a transient statement of law: such was the case of......
-
North of the Border
...be published three times a yearand, by a pleasing arrangement, willbe supplied free for the year 1967.ThecaseofR. v. Martindale [1966]3 All E.R. 305, illustrates the desira-bility of keeping up to date with the83 ...