R v Mclvor
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Judge | LORD JUSTICE LAWTON |
| Judgment Date | 12 November 1981 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1981] EWCA Crim J1112-6 |
| Docket Number | No. 3488/A/80 |
| Date | 12 November 1981 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
5 cases
-
R v Ghosh
...26The Court of Appeal in R. v. Green and Greenstein appear to have approved that passage. At any rate they expressed no disapproval. 27In R. v. McIvor the Court reconciled the two passages quoted from the Judge's summing up as 28"It seems clear that those two passages are concerned with dif......
-
Ivey v Genting Casinos (UK) Ltd (trading as Crockfords)
...[1970] 1 QB 148, R v Royle [1971] 1 WLR 1764 and R v Gilks [1972] 1 WLR 1341 as tending to favour a subjective one. It treated R v McIvor [1982] 1 WLR 409 as an unsustainable attempt to reconcile the two lines. This apparently binary dichotomy is not entirely borne out on analysis. 66 Chron......
-
Brian Kindi Lawi v The State [1987] PNGLR 183
...respect, that in seeking to reconcile the two lines of authority in the way we have mentioned, the Court of Appeal in R v Mclvor [1982] 1 WLR 409 was seeking to reconcile the irreconcilable. It therefore falls to us now either to choose between the two lines of authority or to propose some ......
-
Kwong Wing-foon And Another v The Queen
...conviction are therefore dismissed. (B.L. Jones) Judge of the High Court (1) (1973) 1 All E.R. 341 (2) (1981) l All E.R. 1172 (3) (1982) 1 All E.R. 491 Representation: Mr. Mullick (K.Y. Woo & Co.) for Appellant Mr. Stirling (Legal Department) for Respondent. ...
Get Started for Free
