R v Millington
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | MR JUSTICE McKINNON |
| Judgment Date | 12 May 1995 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1995] EWCA Crim J0426-13 |
| Docket Number | No: 95/1866/X2 |
| Date | 12 May 1995 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
5 cases
-
R v Mohammed
...Grand Ct., May 26th, 2000; on appeal, C.A., November 21st, 2000, Crim. App. No. 40 of 2000, unreported, followed. (7) R. v. Millington, [1996] RTR 80; [1996] Cr. App. R. (S.) 45, considered. (8) R. v. Shepherd, Att.-Gen.”s Reference (Nos. 14 & 24 of 1993), [1994] 1 W.L.R. 530; [1994] 2 All ......
-
R v Daniel Irvine
...at the wheel at the time of the accident. 18 Of more assistance on the facts of this case, therefore, we think is the case of R v Millington. [1996] RTR 80. That was a case involving subsection (1)(b) of section 3A of the 1988 Act and involved a defendant who had had a fatal accident as a r......
-
Hksar v Sheung Kun Hoo Daniel
...sense. Judges as well as juries are expected to act in accordance with common sense and that is what the judge did. In R v Millington [1996] RTR 80, a case of causing death when under the influence of drink, where no expert evidence was called as to the effect of 64 micrograms of alcohol pe......
-
香港特別行政區 訴 林明樂
...和Chu Wing-yin Christine (朱詠妍) 兩案涉案罪行均是「危險駕駛導致他人死亡」罪，但兩案判案書所列舉的「加刑因素」，同樣適用於「不小心駕駛」罪的判刑考慮。 56. 答辯人援引的英國上訴庭案例R v Millington [1996] RTR 80支持裁判官於《判刑理由書》第12段所說：「……但酒後駕駛可以視作不小心駕駛，因為一個小心謹慎的司機，是不會選擇在酒精影響下駕駛的。」 57. 英國上訴庭於Millington案判案書第83頁D行至第 “There can be no issue in this case in applying the appro......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Court of Appeal
...the piece of evidence which the jury may regard as themost important, in its consideration of the nature of the driving. In RvMillington (1996) 160 JP 39, the appellant was convicted of causing deathby careless driving whilst under the influence of alcohol, contrary to s 3Aof the Road Traff......