R v Millington

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeMR JUSTICE McKINNON
Judgment Date12 May 1995
Judgment citation (vLex)[1995] EWCA Crim J0426-13
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Docket NumberNo: 95/1866/X2
Date12 May 1995

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • R v Coe (Christopher)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 14 Julio 2009
    ...a driver, or that the appellant was in fact adversely affected (see R. v McBride [1961] 3 WLR 549, R. v Thorpe [1972] 1 WLR 342 and R. v Millington [1996] RTR 80). The evidence was also relevant to the reasons for which the appellant refused to provide any specimens. We note that when summi......
  • R v Mohammed
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 7 Agosto 2000
    ...Grand Ct., May 26th, 2000; on appeal, C.A., November 21st, 2000, Crim. App. No. 40 of 2000, unreported, followed. (7) R. v. Millington, [1996] RTR 80; [1996] Cr. App. R. (S.) 45, considered. (8) R. v. Shepherd, Att.-Gen.”s Reference (Nos. 14 & 24 of 1993), [1994] 1 W.L.R. 530; [1994] 2 All ......
  • R v Daniel Irvine
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 19 Marzo 2002
    ...wheel at the time of the accident. 18 Of more assistance on the facts of this case, therefore, we think is the case of R v Millington. [1996] RTR 80. That was a case involving subsection (1)(b) of section 3A of the 1988 Act and involved a defendant who had had a fatal accident as a result o......
  • 香港特別行政區 訴 林明樂
    • Hong Kong
    • 22 Diciembre 2022
    ...和Chu Wing-yin Christine (朱詠妍) 兩案涉案罪行均是「危險駕駛導致他人死亡」罪,但兩案判案書所列舉的「加刑因素」,同樣適用於「不小心駕駛」罪的判刑考慮。 56. 答辯人援引的英國上訴庭案例R v Millington [1996] RTR 80支持裁判官於《判刑理由書》第12段所說:「……但酒後駕駛可以視作不小心駕駛,因為一個小心謹慎的司機,是不會選擇在酒精影響下駕駛的。」 57. 英國上訴庭於Millington案判案書第83頁D行至第 “There can be no issue in this case in applying the appro......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Court of Appeal
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 60-3, August 1996
    • 1 Agosto 1996
    ...the piece of evidence which the jury may regard as themost important, in its consideration of the nature of the driving. In RvMillington (1996) 160 JP 39, the appellant was convicted of causing deathby careless driving whilst under the influence of alcohol, contrary to s 3Aof the Road Traff......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT