R v Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Foods, ex parte Hamble (Offshore) Fisheries Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
| Judgment Date | 1995 |
| Date | 1995 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
74 cases
-
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Hargreaves
...balancing exercise to be conducted by the court was based entirely on the decision of Sedley J. in R. v. Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food, ex parte Hamble (Offshore) Fisheries Ltd. [1995] 2 AER 714. The case concerned the judicial review of a decision of the Minister (whereby he d......
- Majlis Perbandaran Pulau Pinang v Syarikat Bekerjasama-sama Serbaguna Sungai Gelugor Dengan Tanggungan
- Dr Chandra Muzaffar v Universiti Malaya
- Darahman Ibrahim v Majlis Mesyuarat Kerajaan Negeri Perlis
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Substantive legitimate expectations in Australian administrative law.
...55 Cambridge Law Journal 289. (24) See, eg, R v Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food," Ex parte Hamble (Offshore) Fisheries LM [1995] 2 All ER 714; R v Gaming Board for Great Britain; Ex parte Kingslev [1996] COD 241; R v Inland Revenue Commissioners; Ex parte Unilever plc [1996] STC ......
-
Public Law Representations and Substantive Legitimate Expectations
...Expectations: A Conceptual Analysis’ (1992) 108 LQR 79.3RvMinistry for Agriculture, Fisheries and Foods, ex p Hamble (Offshore) [1995] 2 All ER 714; RvSecretary of State for Transport, ex p Richmond upon Thames BC [1994] 1 All ER 577; RvSecretaryof State for the Home Department, ex p Hargre......
-
Legitimate Expectations and Prisoners' Rights: The Right to Get What You are Given
...as opposed to procedural expectations, whilst in RvMinistry of Agriculture,Fisheries and Food, ex p Hamble (Offshore) Fisheries Ltd [1995] 2 All ER 714 (noted by Himsworth,‘Legitimately Exceeding Proportionality’ [1996] PL 46) Sedley J held that the doctrine could, inlimited circumstances, ......