R v Moore (Peter)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
JudgeTHE VICE PRESIDENT
Judgment Date12 May 2003
Neutral Citation[2003] EWCA Crim 1574
Docket NumberNo: 199907611/W4
Date12 May 2003

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • The King v Zita Shol
    • Belize
    • Court of Appeal (Belize)
    • 28 September 2022
    ...is impossible to overstate. Though authority for this view is hardly needed, the trial judge referenced R v Christopher Milberry [2003] 2 Cr. App. R. 31, where the gravity of rape was clearly stated and the need for a custodial sentence emphasised. In addition, the trial judge acknowledged......
  • R v Tapecrown Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • Invalid date
    ...1636; [2008] 3 All ER 749, DC The following additional cases, although not cited, were referred to in the skeleton arguments: R v Moore [2003] EWCA Crim 1574; [2003] 1 WLR 2170; [2003] 2 Cr App R 31, R (Ewing) v Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (Practice Note) [2005] EWCA Civ 1583; [2006......
  • The Queen v Walton Cameron [ECSC]
    • British Virgin Islands
    • High Court (British Virgin Islands)
    • 14 March 2014
    ...Unrep 429-43/2009 7 St Lucia Crim Appeal 4/2000 (consolidated with others) 8 Antigua Crim App 5/2006.6/2006 and 8/2006 9 Op Cit 10 [2003] 2 Cr App R 31 11 Adapted from the Guidelines of the Sentencimg advisory Panel 12 Op cit 13 Op cit per Cumberbatch J Between: The Queen and Walton Cameron......
  • Andrew Peter Kury v Maidstone Magistrates' Court
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 26 June 2003
    ...the successful applicants were left out of pocket. 26 Quite recently, the Court of Appeal Criminal Division in the case of Moore [2003] EWCA Crim 1574, Court of Appeal Criminal Division transcript dated 12th May 2003, held in a judgment of the court which I gave, following the decision in H......
  • Get Started for Free