R v Muktar Ibrahim and Others
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | President of the Queen's Bench Division |
| Judgment Date | 23 April 2008 |
| Neutral Citation | [2008] EWCA Crim 880 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Docket Number | Case No: 2007/04146/B5 |
| Date | 23 April 2008 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
Westminster City Council v M (1st Respondent) F (2nd Respondent) H (3rd Respondent)
...a decade and more, relaxed its approach to the nature of the circumstances in which the admission of hearsay evidence is permissible, see: R v Ibrahim [2008] EWCA Crim 880; R v Riat & Ors [2013] Crim LR 60, [2013] 1 Cr App R 2, [2013] 1 WLR 2592, [2013] 1 All ER 349. Though the Court of A......
-
R v Mohammed Abdul Kahar (Reference by Attorney General under s.36 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988)
...We would include within this level cases which, if charged under s.5, would have included the circumstances in Ibrahim & others [2008] EWCA Crim 880 (Conspiracy to murder — the 21/7 plot in which four bombs were detonated on the London Underground but failed to explode, and life sentences ......
-
R v Mohammed Ammer Ali
...Section of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Ibrahim & others v United Kingdom, and also the decision of this court in R v Ibrahim & others [2008] 2 Cr App R 23, where Sir Igor Judge (as he then was) held that the admission of safety interviews or their fruits in evidence at......
-
R. v. S.G., [2008] O.T.C. Uned. A18
...G. "under the influence of older, dedicated and very persuasive political activists"); R. v. Ibrahim, Omar, Osman, Mohamed , [2008] EWCA Crim 880 at para. 165 (in some cases, "it is quite impossible for a sentencing judge to attempt to discern distinctions of degree and invol......
3 books & journal articles
-
Confessions and the Criminal Justice Act 2003
...was not challenged by its maker, the facts of Ibrahim do not 55 [2008] EWCA Crim 10, [2008] 1 WLR 1683 at [57].56 Ibid.57 [2008] EWCA Crim 880; [2008] 2 Cr App R 23 (the paragraphs of the which relate to the issues dealt with in this article are omitted from the CriminalAppeal Reports and W......
-
The Safety-Valve: Discretion to Admit Hearsay Evidence in Criminal Proceedings
...transcript of S’s earlier trial. The Court ofAppeal, recognising that the material from which the summary had99 R v Ibrahim and Omar [2008] EWCA Crim 880, [2009] 1 WLR 578 at [151].100 [1994] Crim LR 745.101 Law Commission, above n. 1 at para. 8.147.102 [2007] EWCA Crim 3035, [2008] 1 Cr Ap......
-
The Self-Incrimination Privilege in Care Proceedings and the Criminal Trial and ‘Shall Not Be Admissible in Evidence’
...and to produce documents. The Supreme Court Act1981 detailed this compulsion with reference to intellectual property13 R v Ibrahim [2008] All ER (D) 329 (Apr). The court held that in accordance withs. 34(2A) of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, when the suspect isproperly deta......